MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2596426804 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.687.687

Comprehensive Sequence Analysis of Relapse and Refractory Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Identifies miRNA and mRNA Transcripts Associated with Treatment Resistance - a Report from the COG/NCI-Target AML Initiative

2015· article· en· W2596426804 sur OpenAlexaff
Emilia L. Lim, Diane L. Trinh, Rhonda E. Ries, Yussanne Ma, James T. Topham, Maya Hughes, Erin Pleasance, Andrew J. Mungall, Richard A. Moore, Yongjun Zhao, Daniela S. Gerhard, Vivian G. Oehler, E. Anders Kolb, Alan S. Gamis, Malcolm A. Smith, Todd A. Alonzo, R.J. Arceci, Soheil Meshinchi, Marco A. Marra

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueMicroRNA in disease regulation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésmicroRNAMyeloid leukemiaMessenger RNABiologyOncologyTranscriptomeInternal medicineBioinformaticsMedicineCancer researchGene expressionGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Induction chemotherapy results in complete remission in 80% of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, many patients either fail to achieve a remission, or relapse after an initial response and subsequently die of their disease. Although large numbers of somatic karyotypic and molecular alterations have been identified, the majority of them do not indicate a specific target or distinct pathway that can be readily exploited for therapeutic intervention. Materials & Methods As part of a genome-scale approach to identify prognostic markers and therapeutic targets, we provide a comprehensive characterization of the pediatric AML transcriptome, detailing miRNA & mRNA expression patterns and miRNA:mRNA interactions that are characteristic of the disease. A total of 676 patients were considered for this study. Our discovery cohort consisted of miRNA-seq from 259 primary, 22 refractory and 38 relapse samples, and mRNA-seq from 158 primary, 12 refractory and 47 relapse samples. We confirmed our survival analyses on a validation cohort that consisted of miRNA-seq and mRNA-seq from 378 and 87 primary samples, respectively. Unsupervised non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) was used to identify patient subgroups based on miRNA/mRNA expression. To identify miRNA/mRNA expression associated with patient survival, Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed. Wilcoxon tests were performed to identify differentially expressed miRNAs/mRNAs between samples. To screen for functional miRNA:mRNA interactions, we identified miRNA and mRNA pairs with anti-correlated expression profiles and miRNA binding site predictions consistent with miRNA:mRNA interaction. Results Survival analysis of both the discovery and validation cohorts revealed that 6 miRNAs were associated with overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) (p-val<0.05, q-val<0.1): miR-181c-3p and miR-378c were associated with superior OS and EFS (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.79-0.88), while miR-106a-3p, miR-106a-5p, miR-363-3p and miR-20b-5p were associated with inferior OS and EFS (HR: 1.14-1.36). All 4 of the miRNAs that were associated with inferior survival are members of the polycistronic miR-106a-363 cluster. Differential expression analysis revealed that miR-106a-363 was abundantly expressed in relapse and refractory samples and in primary samples of refractory patients (q-val<0.05). Integrative miRNA:mRNA expression analysis and luciferase reporter assays further revealed that targets of miR-106a-5p include NDUFC2, NDUFA10, UQCRB, ATP5J2-PTCD1 and ATP5S. Interestingly, these genes are involved in oxidative phosphorylation, a process that is suppressed in treatment-resistant leukemic cells[1]. NMF clustering of miRNA expression profiles revealed 2 groups of patients, with each group characterized by particular genomic alterations: Group 1 cases were enriched for NPM1 mutation and FLT3 -ITD, while Group 2 cases were enriched for t(8;21), inv(16), MLL rearrangements and CEBPA mutation (Fisher's exact test p-val<0.05). NMF clustering of mRNA expression revealed 5 groups of patients, in which the group with abundant expression of ribosomal genes was further distinguished by superior OS and EFS (log-rank p-val<0.05). Analysis of the mRNA data showed a decrease in expression of one mRNA isoform of ribosomal protein L28 (RPL28) in relapse samples (q-val<0.05). In addition, survival analyses revealed that abundant expression of ribosomal protein L10 (RPL10) is associated with superior OS in both the discovery and validation cohorts (p-val<0.05, q-val<0.1, HR: 0.78 & 0.47). Conclusions Through a detailed analysis of the transcriptome (Figure A), we identified miRNAs whose expression levels were significantly associated with clinical outcome. In addition, we showed that abundant expression of miR-106a-363 might contribute to treatment resistance by modulating genes involved in energy metabolism. We also demonstrated that reduced expression of ribosomal genes is associated with inferior outcomes, suggesting a dysregulation of protein translation in treatment resistance. Overall, our transcriptome profiles provide clinically meaningful data for risk and response identification and define novel pathways that may be amenable to therapeutic targeting. Figure 1. Summary of the pediatric AML transcriptome Lagadinou ED, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2013. Figure 1. Summary of the pediatric AML transcriptome. / Lagadinou ED, et al. Cell Stem Cell. 2013. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,002

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMicroRNA in disease regulationTravaux en français237 207