Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The British Columbia Ministries of Environment and Agriculture are working with the Whatcom County staff to pilot a project for BC agriculture operators to do a manure application risk assessment for specific fields if they would like to spread manure during the winter season. This pilot project is based on a program developed by the Whatcom County in response to concerns about their dairy industry. There have been concerns for many years regarding the water quality issues in the Lower Fraser Valley on both sides of the Washington State and British Columbia (BC) border. Agricultural operations and activities appear to be a significant contributing factor to the contamination (nitrates, phosphorus, pathogens) in surface waters and groundwater. Winter spreading is generally not recommended as there is a high risk for runoff from fields into watercourses and leaching into groundwater. The BC Ministries of Environment, Agriculture and Health and the Canadian federal government departments, such as Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada have been cooperating and collaborating on these issues for many years, bringing what various resources they have to the issue. However, achieving compliance with requirements of the BC Ministry of Environment (ENV) Agricultural Waste Control Regulation (AWCR) has several challenges, including ambiguous and unspecific wording in the regulation. For example, in the current regulation, the emphasis on the phrase of “not causing pollution”, or prohibiting an activity “if it causes pollution” is problematic because it is not protective of the environment or human health — in actuality, it authorizes discharges up to a pollution threshold, does not consider cumulative impacts, and is proving resource intensive with respect to securing adequate evidence. Other jurisdictions appear to be ahead of BC in addressing these problems. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and Washington State’s Environmental Agency have expressed concerns regarding international water quality issues (e.g., nitrates in Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer and surface waters migrating south), which need to be addressed. As well, the Agricultural Waste Control Regulation (AWCR) has not had a comprehensive review since it came into force in 1992. For these and other reasons, the AWCR was identified as a priority for review and updating to deal with the adverse impacts to the environment and human health from agricultural operations and activities in a more efficient and effective manner. The main challenge is to find appropriate and innovative ways to protect human health and the environment, provide regulatory certainty and ensure a sustainable and economically robust agricultural industry in BC.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».