MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2597790781

Personality Traits and Family Size as the Predictors of Alexithymia among University Undergraduates

2012· article· en· W2597790781 sur OpenAlex
Irsa Tahir, Saba Ghayas, Wajeha Tahir

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of behavioural sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueHealth and Well-being Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAlexithymiaPsychologyFeelingPersonalityExtraversion and introversionBig Five personality traitsNeuroticismOpenness to experienceDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologySocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Alexithymia is a maladaptive psychological problem characterized by the inability to identify and verbally describe emotions and feelings in one as well as in others. Expression of emotions is learned from the environment as well as an inborn tendency (Gunsch, 2010). Sifheos (1973) introduced the term alexithymia. The word alexithymia literally means no words for emotion, from the Greek a for lack, lexis for word and thymia for emotion. He also describes that alexithymia is a disturbance in affective and cognitive functioning and lack of ability to find words to describe feelings. The most important features of alexithymia are failure to discriminate one's feelings from the associated bodily sensations, inability to communicate one's feelings with others and absence of fantasy and inner thoughts.It is suggested that the maladaptive alexithymic attitude is associated with early life experiences, poor parenting style, any kind of trauma, too much attention of caretaker towards child body rather than emotional needs, and emotional inconsistency of caretakers (Krystal, 1988).Alexithymia is considered as a personality trait that may lead an individual to other medical and psychiatric disorders, but it is not necessary that an individual respond as a mental patient (Haviland, Warren, & Riggs, 2000). Personality is a collection of emotions, thoughts, and behavioral patterns unique to a person (Gunnertech, 2010).Most famous personality traits are Openness to Experience (O) (inventive, curious, fond of art and adventure, have unusual ideas and emotions, and variety of experience), Neuroticism (N) (sensitive, anxious, and irritable, have much anger, depression, or vulnerability) Extraversion (E) (energetic, cheerful, lively, sociable and outgoing with positive emotions), Agreeableness (A) (friendly, compassionate, characterized by trust, modesty, and compassion), Conscientiousness (C) (efficient, well organized, dutifulness, self-discipline, aim for achievement, behave in organize, and in planned manner show punctuality and purposefulness) (Digman, 1990). It is known as the FiveFactor Model (McCrae & John, 1992).Ejopeo (1999) examined the relationship between personality traits and alexithymia. Luminet, Bagby, Wagner, Taylor and Parker (1999) also conducted a research on alexithymia and Five -Factor Model (FFM) of personality. The study participants were 101 university students who completed the questionnaires, Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. The result of that study portrayed that alexithymia have positive correlation with Neuroticism (N) and negative relation with Extraversion (E) and Openness (O), whereas Agreeableness (A) and Conscientiousness (C) have found no significant relation with alexithymia.Another study has revealed that alexithymia is positively associated with neuroticism and negatively correlated with extraversion. Furthermore there was low correlation of alexithymia with psychoticism (Mayer, DiPaolo, & Salovey, 1990).Many researchers have revealed that alexithymia is positively associated with neuroticism (Luminet, Bagby, Wagner, Taylor, & Parker, 1999; Pandey, & Mandai, 1996; Schiattino, Sanfuentes, Lagarribel, Jara, Lolas, & Liberman, 1998; & Wise, Mann, & Shay, 1992) and introversion (Wise, Mann, & Shay, 1992; & Pandey, & Mandai, 1996).Some Studies are conducted on alexithymia and five-factor model of personality showed that extraversion and openness to experience are low correlated with low alexithymia and highly associated with neuroticism (Bagby, Parker, & Taylor, 1994; Muller, Buhner, & Ellgring, 2004; Zimmerman, Rossier, de Stadelhofen, & Gaillard, 2005).Philippe, Genoud, Rossier and Reicherts (2005) have used EPI Extraversion scale and Toronto Alexithymia Scale (Bagby, Taylor, & Parker, 1994) and the study participants were 93 adults. Results revealed that there is a meaning full relationship between alexithymia and emotional openness. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,379

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle