MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2598808606 · doi:10.2134/cs2015-48-2-6

The Potato Sustainability Initiative: Promoting, tracking, and reporting progress

2015· article· en· W2598808606 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
C A Nelson, Patrick Shannon-Hughes, Thomas Green

Notice bibliographique

RevueCrops & Soils · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant Pathogens and Resistance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSustainabilityBusinessWork (physics)Integrated pest managementBest practiceAgricultural scienceMarketingEngineeringManagementEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Improving sustainability, leaving the world in a better place than we found it, is becoming an expectation in the marketplace. Consumers are choosing products based on what corporations are doing to improve health and the environment. Many corporations have executive-level positions in sustainability and provide detailed annual sustainability reports to shareholders and the public. Food companies are among the leaders, including those participating in the new industry-wide Potato Sustainability Initiative (PSI). This effort brings together potato growers, processors, distributors, and retailers under a single, comprehensive program to improve sustainability in the potato supply chain in the U.S. and Canada. The Initiative grew out of project started in 2010 to develop an integrated pest management (IPM) practice survey for potato growers supplying McDonald's. The goal was to promote, track, and report adoption of IPM and other best practices that help reduce pesticide use and risks. A group including growers, three potato processors— ConAgra Foods Lamb Weston, McCain's, and Simplot—McDonald's, the National Potato Council, the Canadian Horticulture Council, and the IPM Institute assembled in Chicago to develop an action plan and timetable. The group contracted with FoodLogiQ, a technology company based in North Carolina, to put the survey online. Rich Burres, Sustainable Ag Manager for ConAgra Lamb Weston, reports, “With this project, we were able to expand upon and improve earlier work led by the National Potato Council more than a dozen years ago to survey and report on grower IPM practices. The online survey format allowed us to reach all of our growers and summarize responses efficiently.” Over four growing seasons, the group worked to develop, implement, and improve an online practice survey with more than 400 potato growers. Each grower responded to questions addressing a variety of best practices including crop rotation to help manage Colorado potato beetle and other pests, weather monitoring for forecasting diseases, and the need for fungicide applications and scouting and trapping for insect pests. Questions and answers were distributed among four levels—Basic, Steward, Expert, and Master—representing the group's assessment of performance. Basic-level responses included compliance with laws regarding pesticide use as well as farm worker and environmental protection. The Steward level included proven practices that can be implemented on most farms and by most growers, such as use of scouting and thresholds for common pests. The Expert level included advanced practices such as monitoring populations of beneficial insects and taking advantage of the pest control they provide on at least a portion of potato crop acres. For Master-level credit, growers had to respond in the affirmative to questions addressing practices designed to improve soil health, water quality, and conservation. Growers could earn advanced credit by using tools to help identify reduced-risk pesticide options. Tools include the Environmental Impact Quotient,1 which provides ratings for more than 120 pesticides; the Windows Pesticide Screening Tool,2 developed by USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, which evaluates pesticide impact on soil, groundwater, and surface water, and the Pesticide Risk Mitigation Engine,3 which estimates pesticide risks and mitigation options based on soil type, application rate and method, and other factors. Each year, results were reported on the National Potato Council website. Trends showed a gradual, steady improvement in scores (Fig. 1). Participation has increased from 244 in 2010 to 449 growers in 2013. In 2013, 97.7% of surveyed growers achieved at least a basic level of IPM stewardship, with 48.0% at the Master level of IPM practitioners. The annual overall rating index has steadily increased over four years, starting at 2.83 in 2010 and improving to 3.11 in 2013. Survey results can be found on the National Potato Council website.4 IPM survey results, 2010 (left) and 2013 (right). The number of growers participating has nearly doubled. The overall performance index has increased from 2.83 to 3.11 over the same time period. In 2014, more than 500 growers participated in the new, expanded sustainability survey. IPM survey results, 2010 (left) and 2013 (right). The number of growers participating has nearly doubled. The overall performance index has increased from 2.83 to 3.11 over the same time period. In 2014, more than 500 growers participated in the new, expanded sustainability survey. In 2013, McDonald's asked the group to broaden the survey to include additional practices important to sustainability including waste reduction, air quality, energy and water conservation, and greenhouse gas reduction. In addition, Basic America Foods, Cavendish, Heinz, Sysco, and the Washington State Potato Commission are now represented on the team. As Monte Anderson, Agricultural Sustainability Manager at J.R. Simplot describes, “This industry-wide initiative has brought together our largest Potato Quick Service Restaurant and Foodservice customers along with raw potato suppliers and major potato processors for a single program that covers all aspects of agriculture sustainability.” The group also decided to incorporate metrics, or measures that track outcomes that can result from improved practices. For example, in 2015, growers will report worker safety performance based on the number of incidents divided by total number of hours worked. Metrics have also been developed for fertilizer and irrigation water use efficiency and greenhouse gas and pesticide risk reduction. “Where possible, we want to measure and report outcomes,” says Eric Ritchie, Agriculture Manager, North America, Food Safety, Sustainability, and Policy for McCain's Foods. “Best practices are important to promote and measure; outcome metrics help us track how our practices are performing in delivering the benefits we are aiming for.” In 2014, 516 potato growers across the U.S. and Canada completed the new survey. The ultimate goal is to engage all potato production to avoid duplication of effort and reduce the burden on producers and processors. As Anderson put it, “The common goal of having one comprehensive agriculture sustainability program accepted across the marketplace is a win for all.” One of the largest impacts of PSI is its streamlining of sustainability programs. Ed Schneider, Schneider Farms in Pasco, Washington says, “Growers appreciate the need for communicating the good things we are doing to consumers. This effort helps us by allowing us to report to multiple buyers at one time.” Next up for the team is developing a verification program to formalize quality control and assurance, both at the grower and processor level. To learn more, contact Patrick Shannon-Hughes at pshannon-hughes@ipminstitute.org.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,497
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,360

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCrops & SoilsMême sujetPlant Pathogens and ResistanceTravaux en français237 207