Experimental and Numerical Modeling of a Tidal Energy Channeling Structure
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Tidal power, or the use of tides for electricity production, exists in many forms including tidal barrages, which exploit tidal head differentials, and turbines placed directly in regions with large tidal current velocities. The latter is actively being investigated in many countries around the world as a means of providing renewable and wholly predictable electricity (cf. wind, solar and wave power). The expansion of the in-stream tidal industry is hindered however by several factors including: turbine durability, deployment and maintenance costs, and the lack of abundant locations which meet the necessary current velocities for turbine start-up and economic power production. A new novel type of augmentation device, entitled the ‘Tidal Acceleration Structure’ or TAS (Canadian patent pending 2644792), has been proposed as a solution to the limited number of coastal regions which exhibit fast tidal currents. In preliminary investigations, the TAS, a simple Venturi section consisting of walls extending from the seafloor to above the high water mark in an hourglass shape, was found as able to more than double current velocities entering the device. The results indicated a significant advantage over other current channeling technologies and thus the need for more in-depth investigations. The main objective of the present study was to optimise the design of the TAS and to predict the power that a turbine placed within it could extract from flow. To do this, two principal methods were employed. Firstly, a 1:50 scale model of the TAS was tested and its shape optimised in a 1.5 m wide flume. Secondly, a 3D numerical model (ANSYS Fluent) was used for comparison with the experimental results. During the tests, a TAS configuration was found that could accelerate upstream velocities by a factor of 2.12. In separate tests, turbines were simulated using Actuator Disc Theory and porous plates. The TAS-plate combination was found to be able to extract up to 4.2 times more power from flow than the stand-alone plate, demonstrating that the TAS could provide turbines with a significant advantage in slower currents. Though further research is needed, including the testing of a larger TAS model in conjunction with a small in-stream turbine, the results of this thesis clearly demonstrate the potential of the TAS concept to unlock vast new areas for tidal energy development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».