MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2599232491

Careers for Kids! How to Help Your Kids Choose a Career

2015· article· en· W2599232491 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahniko Handford

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Career Planning and Adult Development Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChild Welfare and Adoption
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyCareer developmentMedical educationPedagogyMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Careers for Kids! How to Help Your Kids Choose a Career, by Robert Shewchuk. 2013. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Start Smart Publishing. 157 Pages. Paper. $14.95 CDNThe subtitle of this book is How to Help Your Kids Chose a and it is clearly aimed at parents wanting to help their teens select potential careers suited to their skills, gifts, and interests. This book's chatty, conversational style puts the reader at ease immediately, assuring us you don't have to be a Counselor with years of training and experience to help guide your child through the labyrinth of career exploration. I am a big fan of how this book is organized. Visually, it is a very easy read with plenty of white space on each page, and Mr. Shewchuk has kept this book to a manageable 157 pages. Further, its information has been precisely categorized. There are seven chapters arranged to address each progressive step of career planning, none of them lengthy, and all of them packed solid with current career exploration practices combined with ideas, suggestions, and personal stories.Careers for Kids could have been a hard sell, considering the training, education, and hands-on experience career counsellors are expected to accumulate to do theirjob well. However, Mr. Shewchuk is able to provide enough solid background in basic career exploration that parents can feel they come to this project with a understanding of what is required of both themselves and their teen. For example, he uses the visual of Old Linear vs. New Zig Zag as a model to identify the pattern of career paths in the 21st century compared to those of thirty years ago, and with which most parents would be more familiar. He then introduces the concept of how Labor Market trends work, illustrating as a case in point, how technology has motivated the decline in watch-wearing now that most people have cell phones. His invented phrases are fun and engaging. He uses Career Mashers to describe mixing several interests together to mash a new career, such as a writer passionate about the environment. Another example is Career Moochers which describes discovering support roles in trending sectors such as technology even if one is not tech-savvy.The process of elimination, personality metrics, the making of lists, and research plans are all typical of most career exploration processes. Mr. Shewchuk offers them in such a concise and defined blueprint - including steps on keeping your youth motivated, and suggestions for exploring options within the broader categories such as education and health - that I can see how this would be an enjoyable, informative, and engaging project for both parents and teens. There are some recurring suggestions in the book that repetitive work, manual labour and retail jobs are perhaps not the good jobs to which to aspire.However, in my own career as an Employment Counselor, I have met retail associates and hospitality servers whose passion is delivering superb customer service, and they have honed their craft to such an art that they are actively sought out in their sectors by employers and recruiters. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,574
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,094
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Career Planning and Adult Development JournalMême sujetChild Welfare and AdoptionTravaux en français237 207