MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2599352595

Dementia and People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

2015· article· en· W2599352595 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Norberto Álvarez

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational journal of child health and human development · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIntellectual disabilityDementiaMedicinePsychiatryLife expectancyActivities of daily livingMoodPsychologyPediatricsGerontologyPopulationDiseaseInternal medicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IntroductionDementia is an acquired syndrome secondary to many causes. common feature is the continuous progressive deterioration of intellectual functions and personality changes, associated with a marked decline in activities of daily living. Memory loss, a common early sign, is followed by impairment in other domains like language, judgment, mood changes, psychiatric disorders, like hallucinations, psychosis, and sleep disorders. These symptoms are also associated with gait deterioration, swallowing disorders, loss of activities of daily living and in some cases epileptic seizures. clinical presentation is variable depending on the cause and the individual affected.Dementia and agingDementia, a condition age related, is becoming more important in people with DD, as, given the marked improvement observed in the last 30 years in the quality of care they receive, the life expectancy is getting longer.The 1923 report from the US Census Bureau on persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) living in institutions showed that around 67% were between the ages of ten and thirty years, 95% were under the age of 40, and only 1% above the age of sixty (1). Most of the deaths occurred in the first decade particularly the first two years of life. mortality ratios directly correlated with the degree of intellectual disability and approximately 50% of the deaths were due to infectious disorders. Epilepsy and heart conditions were also reported as frequent cause of death. Similar results were observed in a study that evaluated cause of death of individuals admitted to an institution in California during the period 1944-1962 (2).The life expectancy of persons with IDD living in three institutions in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, between the years 1917-1930, was 30 years for males and 32 years for females (3, 4).At Wrentham Developmental Center, an institution for persons with IDD in Massachusetts, there were 365 individuals residing as of April 1999; the average age was 55 years, (range 34-91 years), 160 persons were over the age of 55 years, and 47 of them were 70 years or more. Fifty-two individuals died between January 1995 and June 2000, the average age at death was 64 yrs (range 33-90 years). In 2014 there were 314 individuals living in the facility, average age was 63 years (range 33 to 101 years) 270 of them were 65 years or older.In some groups of individuals with IDD the increase in age was even more dramatic. life span of children born with Down syndrome was 9 years in the 1920s, increased to 30 years in the 1960s, and to 55 years in 1993 (5, 6) In 1996 it was reported that in California the life expectancy of a 1 year old child with Down syndrome and profound IDD was 43 years and increase to 55 years in those with mild to moderate degree of IDD (7). At WDC, in 1999, the average age of persons with DS at the time of death was 61 yrs. (range 47-70 yrs.).A prospective study done in British Columbia, Canada in 1995 (8), with a cohort of more than 3,000 individuals with cerebral palsy, found an overall survival rate of 87% at age 30 years. Also it was estimated that for those in the 30-39 years bracket, the possibilities of survival to the next decade was in the order of 90%. With proper resources, people with hemiplegia and IDD can live well after 70 years (9).Recognition of the issueThe recognition of the special needs of the elderly person with IDD is relatively new. Early workers in the field presented the issue of aging in IDD in the 1960's (10), but gerontological issues were not as prevalent as they are now (11) and it is only in the past 20-25 years that the special needs of older adults with IDD were recognized. For example the first full session on The aging mentally retarded was presented at the 12th Congress on Gerontology, in Germany, in 1981 (12).This awareness led to a positive response from governmental agencies. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,043

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational journal of child health and human developmentMême sujetGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersTravaux en français237 207