M125. Predictors of Community Tenure in Patients With Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia Following Discharge From a Social Learning Inpatient Program
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Resistance to antipsychotic treatment is a significant clinical problem in patients with schizophrenia. The Social Learning Inpatient Program at New York—Presbyterian, Westchester Division is a specialized inpatient program based on a social learning model which includes interventions such as social skills training, cognitive remediation, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for Psychosis and other token economy-based interventions. The goal of our study was to determine if treatment at our program was associated with lower re-hospitalization rates after discharge and to look for predictors of successful community tenure. Methods: 58 patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) consented to participate in the study and were assessed at the time of discharge and then followed up with a phone call at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months to collect information regarding re-hospitalization. TRS was defined based on 2 failed adequate antipsychotic trials. Assessments at the time of discharge included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) which were administered by trained clinicians. PANSS ratings were summed into composite scales informed by the 5-factor model of the PANSS—these included Positive, Negative, Disorganization, Excitement/Agitation, and Emotional Distress subscales. We used a binary logistic regression (BLR) model to identify the fewest set of symptom variables that will predict successful community tenure amongst patients discharged from the social learning program. We used an ANOVA to compare the MOCA cognitive scores. Results: Fifty-six percent of the patients were men, 36% were Caucasian, 40% African American, 20% Hispanic and 4% were Asian. At 6 months following discharge, 23% of patients with TRS were re-hospitalized at least once and 77 % of patients maintained community tenure without re-hospitalization. The overall BLR model was significant (−2LogL = 19.54, χ2(1) = 6.86, P = .009). The selected BLR model accounted for 37.9% variance in the data (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.379) and correctly predicted the hospitalization status of 74% of patients discharged. The BLR identified the Disorganization subscale of the PANSS as the strongest predictor of re-hospitalization within 6 months. Patients who were re-hospitalized within 6 months also had lower memory subscale scores (F =30.25, P = .032) than non-re-hospitalized patients. Conclusion: Seventy-seven percent of patients discharged from the social learning program were able to maintain community tenure without re-hospitalization in the 6 months after discharge. The disorganization subscale of the PANSS and lower memory subscale scores were the strongest predictors of re-hospitalization. Specific interventions delivered in an inpatient setting targeting symptoms of disorganization and cognitive deficits might be helpful in preventing re-hospitalization in this patient population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».