MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2599440433

Ink, Stink Bait, Revenge, and Queen Elizabeth: A Yorkshire Yeoman's Household Book

2016· article· en· W2599440433 sur OpenAlex
Robert Tittler

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueShakespeare studies · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueScottish History and National Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueen (butterfly)BalladBattleFeudEmperorHistoryPoetryNarrativeArt historyCraftClassicsArtLiteratureAncient historyArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ink, Stink Bait, Revenge, and Queen Elizabeth: A Yorkshire Yeoman's Household Book Steven W. May and Arthur F. Marotti Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014 Several years ago the British Library received a large collection of papers of the Spencer and Stanhope extended family of Cannon Hall, Yorkshire, which they considered valuable chiefly for the correspondence of Lord Nelson's second in command at the Battle of Trafalgar. Upon arrival, a thorough examination of the full contents of the collection turned up a household book compiled by John Hanson of Rastrick, Yorkshire, a tenant of the Elizabethan-era family patriarch John Stanhope. Hanson (1517-99), a scrivener and apparently self-taught legal advisor, proved a man of broad interests. The diverse contents of his book speak to many of them. Hanson recorded a lengthy prose narrative plus a later ballad concerning a bitter fourteenth-century inter-family feud (Chapter 1); two long-lost broadside ballads describing Queen Elizabeth's post-Armada celebratory procession through London (Chapter 2); several texts copied from printed sources (Chapter 3); and other, unpublished, texts including two poems attributed to Elizabeth herself (Chapter 4). These are all bound together with lists of English monarchs, manorial tenants, and English counties, and instructions and recipes on such diverse subjects as making inks and pigments and catching fish and fowl. This intriguing and hitherto unknown source inspired Steven W. May and Arthur F. Marotti to undertake their summary and analysis of Hanson's work, to transcribe much of its contents, and more generally to emphasize the importance of an early modern scribal culture which has often been overlooked in assessing the intellectual tenor of the times. (Their inventive and certainly distinctive title derives from some of Hanson's own terms and themes: it remains to be seen if it will be easily remembered or readily forgotten in its full extent.) Hanson proves an apt subject for a discussion of scribal culture. May and Marotti make much of the importance of such a collection emanating from the pen of someone whom they describe as a mere yeoman. One may quibble with that social description, as Hanson appears to have derived his income and reputation from his work as a professional scrivener and legal advisor as well as from the collection of rents. But even this modest status at the lowest rung of the legal profession illustrates the sub-elite social level at which such a culture thrived by the mid-Elizabethan era, whilst his rural west Yorkshire base illustrates its geographic range. Those are important attributes. Modern scholarship has tended to observe pre-modern English scribal culture amongst the elevated social ranks operating from the country houses of the day or in proximity to London and the universities. Hanson's book may be unusual in emanating from someone of his social status, but it is not unique. May and Marotti very usefully place it in the context of other such efforts carried out, for example, by Thomas Brampton of Kempton, Suffolk; Henry Gurney of Great Ellingham, Norfolk; and, most interestingly, Hanson's fellow west Yorkshireman and contemporary John Kaye of Woodsome. (1) Given the undeniable fact that the material remains of sub-gentry or minor gentry families are far less likely to survive than those of the more affluent and generationally stable status groups, we are fortunate to have such works. As May and Marotti note, the preservation of most surviving household or commonplace books of this era result from the family's subsequent rise to long-term stability and affluence. (2) John Kaye's literary remains, for example, survived as the family became more affluent, influential and affluent in successive generations. John Kaye himself established his 'house' by shrewd investments in agricultural lands and coal mines. His direct descendants included a baronet in the early seventeenth century and a leading inventor of industrial machinery in the eighteenth, whilst the family seat at Woodsome survived into the twentieth. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,224
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,780

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,079
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,184 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle