National Teams in Women's Soccer World Cup from 1991 to 2015: Participation, Performance and Competitiveness
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IntroductionThe first Women's Soccer World Cup was held in 1991 in China. Since then, the number of teams participating in the competition is increasing as well as the number of studies about the sport (Datson et al., 2014). Most of the studies about women's soccer have investigated the sociological and physiological aspects of the sport and the frequent injuries suffered by the athletes. Just a few studies have investigated athletes and teams characteristics in this tournament.Studies about Women's World Cup analyzed the perceptions of stress and coping of the athletes during the preparatory period to the 1999 finals (Holt and Hogg, 2002), compared characteristics of women's soccer matches to men's matches in 1991 (Miyamura et al., 1997) and analyzed the offensive tactics of the quarterfinalists teams in 1999 (Konstadinidou and Tsigilis, 2005).Although analysis of international competitions, such as the World Cup and Olympic Games, provides valuable information about changes and trends among the top teams in women's soccer (Bergier et al., 2008), no study to date has examined the participation and performance of national teams throughout the editions of the championship.Studies about national women's soccer discussed about the recognition, legitimacy and visibility of women's soccer in the United States and the Netherlands (Knoppers and Anthonissen, 2003), Canada (Ann Hall, 2003), Norway (Fasting, 2003), Sweden (Hjelm and Olofsson, 2003), South Africa (Pelak, 2010) and Brazil (Votre and Mourao, 2013). However, the identification of the national teams with highest participations and performances during World Cup editions would allow inferring which countries are giving greater support and growth opportunity to the athletes.Performance of the teams can be analyzed through their final ranking in the championship or using performance indicators. The performance analysis is often facilitated if the performance indicators are expressed as ratios (Hughes and Barlett, 2002). In the case of FIFA Women's World Cup, the analysis of the goals per games ratio throughout all editions can give indications about the development of the national teams and the competitiveness among them over the years.Therefore, the first aim of this study was to analyze nation teams' participation in Women's World Cup from 1991 to 2015. The second aim was to analyze, through participation in quarterfinals and ratio of goals per game, performance and competitiveness of teams throughout the editions.Material & methodsParticipants and proceduresIn order to carry out this study, all the seven editions of Women's World Cup from 1991 to 2015 were analyzed. From each edition were collected the total goals scored, participating teams and final team rankings. From each championship were collected data from all played games.In tournaments from 1991 to 2015 there were a total of 232 played games. From 1991 to 2011 the championships were composed by five phases: group stage, quarterfinals, semi-finals, play-off for third place and final. The 2015 edition also had the round of 16 phases. Games from all the phases were analyzed.From each match were collected the participant teams and the final score of the game. From the result of each game we calculated the goal difference between the winning and losing team. Goals scored in penalty decisions were not considered in this study.All data were collected on the official website of the Federation Internationale de Football Association. Data used in this study are public and available online.Statistical analysisAll data were tabulated and arranged in Microsoft Excel worksheet and then exported to GraphPad Prism 7 (San Diego, California, USA) in which were performed all statistical analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the collected data.From the collected data were calculated the ratio of goals per game for each edition of the championship and for each participant team. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle