Factors associated with referral to medical oncology (MO) and subsequent use of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) among patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A population-based study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
1583 Background: ACT for NSCLC is associated with improved survival in the general population but may be underutilized. Underutilization may relate to lack of referral from surgeon to MO, MO not offering ACT, or patient declining ACT. Here we explore factors associated with referral to MO and use of ACT among patients with resected NSCLC in Ontario Canada. Methods: The Ontario Cancer Registry was used to identify all incident cases of NSCLC diagnosed in Ontario 2004-2006. We linked electronic records of treatment to identify surgery, ACT, and MO consultation. Co-morbidity was classified using the Charlson Comorbidity Index modified for administrative data. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with referral to MO and use of ACT. Results: 3354 cases of NSCLC were resected in Ontario 2004-2006, 1830 (55%) were seen post-operatively by MO and 1032 (31%) were treated with ACT. Cases younger than 70 were more likely to have MO consultation (age 60-69 OR 1.6; 50-59 OR 2.3; 20-49 OR 2.2, p<0.001) as were cases with stage II/III (ORs 2.7 and 2.0, p<0.01) compared to stage I disease. There was substantial geographic variation in the proportion of surgical cases referred to MO (range 32-88%, p<0.001). Among cases seen by MO, patients younger than 70 were more likely to have ACT (age 60-69 OR 3.1; 50-59 OR 4.7; 20-49 OR 6.7, p<0.001) as were cases with stage II/III (ORs 2.7 and 3.0, p<0.001) compared to stage I disease. Less co-morbidity (OR 2.1, p=0.02) and shorter post-operative stay (OR 1.4, p=0.001) were also associated with use of ACT. Among cases seen by MO, there was some geographic variation (range 46-63%, p<0.001) in rates of ACT utilization. Conclusions: The upstream decision to refer to MO is associated with age and stage of disease and these factors have an even greater effect on ACT utilization once patients are seen by MO. While co-morbidity and post-operative length of stay are not associated with referral to MO, they are associated with use of ACT among cases seen by MO. There is substantial geographic variation in referral patterns to MO and less variation in ACT utilization once patients are seen by MO.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».