Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The general aim of this paper is to elaborate on the political philosophy of John Rawls, specifically his concepts such as the original position, the veil of ignorance, and the difference principle.In clarifying these concepts, it will be shown why Rawls has been so influential in the field of political philosophy.The specific aim of this paper, though, is to critique his theory of justice, often termed "justice as fairness," as insufficient in dealing with gender inequality in society, such as the exploitation of women within the institution of the family.In doing so, a paradox will be presented, showing Rawls' continual inability to back his claim that the principles of justice do not apply to the family, but that the family is imperative in cultivating one's sense of justice.Realizing this, it will be argued that it is unjust for Rawls' theory of justice to be applied in a society that believes in gender equality, as it is in opposition to feminist scholarship.John Rawls' A Theory of Justice is often considered the most important work of political philosophy of the twentieth century.A large part of this reason is because of the influence it has had on the thought of other political theorists.This influence, in many cases, is not that of praise; many thinkers have come to criticize Rawls.This paper will focus on one of these major criticisms, this being the failure to account for the subordination of women in society, specifically in Rawls' lack of acknowledgment of the institution of the family.It will be argued, then, that although Rawls made significant progress in political philosophy, his theory should not be considered a complete theory of justice when it possesses such a flaw.First, Rawls' thought will be praised, largely by discussing the originality of A Theory of Justice, notably in introducing the concept of the original position, the veil of ignorance, and the difference principle.Second, Rawls' thought that the principles of justice only apply to the basic structure of society will be acknowledged, as well as an argument against distributive justice as being inefficient to deal with issues of feminism.This will lead, lastly, to the feminist thought that "the personal is political," wherein there will be a thorough discussion in regards to Rawls' brief thoughts towards the family and how he claims his principles of justice do not apply to it, as well as the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».