Commentary on “Concurrent Validity Between Live and Home Video Observations Using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“How should I apply this information?” We embrace evidence-based technology in our practices to improve outcomes. Our challenge is whether this technology can be adopted across populations and is transferable to different settings. On the basis of most current service models, an evaluation performed from a home recording would not be reimbursed. However, there is merit to this form of assessment. Staff shortages, meeting the needs of patients in a timely manner, serving rural areas, and families with infants too medically compromised to travel could benefit from a recorded assessment. The pediatric physical therapist would have the opportunity to observe the infant in the natural environment. A recording offers a permanent visual record of an infant's motor progression. Parent Response: The parent of an infant undergoing an evaluation needs a great deal of support and reassurance. I would like to be able to be with a therapist, physician, or whomever I am consulting with, to read the evaluators body language, ask as many questions as necessary, and have the full attention of the person evaluating my infant. “What should I be mindful about when applying this information?” It was unclear whether the evaluators were able to stop the video footage and replay. Video offers repeated viewing of an infant's performance in contrast to an on-site evaluation. We need to consider the benefit of having on-site as opposed to video and whether the camera captures the subtle nuances of an infant's motor skills. The families participating in the study were carefully screened and were educated and with access to a recording device. The instructions for parents may not be appropriate for our various patient populations, with their unique characteristics. Some families might not have the abilities or equipment to carry through the process. It may be difficult for some families to find 30 minutes for recording and a location. Financial resources, parent skill, and comfort level with recording, as well as sibling participation, may impact the home recording. Parent Response: As a parent, I would not be in favor of a video assessment for my child. I feel that having a video assessment is very impersonal. I equate it to texting someone instead of calling and speaking directly to the person. Roberta “Bertie” Gatlin, PT, DScPT, PCS University Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis, Tennessee Sue Hausch, PT, DPT Children's Rehabilitation Center White Plains, New York Linda Caruso Mother of a child with complex medical needs
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».