MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2600178819

The International Baccalaureate: Guidance Counselling, Predictions and the Middle Years Programme

2016· article· en· W2600178819 sur OpenAlex
Mark D Grant

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational schools journal · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConsistency (knowledge bases)Set (abstract data type)Mathematics educationMedical educationPsychologyPedagogyMedicineComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Programme (MYP) has been running for 35 years and the number of schools offering the MYP continues to grow each year, Whatever its educational or philosophical position within the IB programme as a whole, a matter that is sometimes debated, the MYP does ofter guidance counsellors a set of data on the academic progress of students. Yet how this data might be used towards predictions for applications to higher education is apparently not a topic that is much discussed.Predictions in contextGuidance counsellors need to have accurate predictions for university applications around the world. To do so ensures that students have realistic plans for higher education. Naturally a student predicted 30 points in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (DP) would be ill-advised to apply to a degree course that usually demands 41 points. Consistency with predictions also brings trust from university admissions staff. When offering a place to read for a degree they can be reasonably sure that the student concerned is going to perform as expected in the final exams.Yet often teachers are pressurised by students and parents to record overly optimistic predictions. Faced by such pressure teachers need the support of guidance counsellors to hold with reality. Students (and their parents) need the proven data behind the predictions in order to show that their school is supporting them in the best way possible. As to how this support may be provided, this article explores the relationship between predictions, the MYP grades and DP scores, The data has been collected at one international school over five years.The MYP is often compared to the International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE), At guidance meetings at an international school parents often ask which system is better for university applications. This comparison is particularly relevant to predictions. Both the MYP and IGGSE are designed to support international students, especially in Years 10 and ll/Grades 9 and 10 (Ellwood 1999: 35). IGCSE is familiar to university admissions staff around the world.For example, in the UK entry to degree courses will usually specify at least a G grade each in IGGSE English language and mathematics; entry to Swiss universities is allowed with certain combinations of IGCSE and A level subjects; some Lander in Germany recognise IGCSE as the equivalent of the Mittlere Reife; and Canadian universities entertain IGGSE science subjects alongside the DP or A levels to support applications to degrees such as engineering. Students aiming for a leading university in the UK would typically have demonstrated their academic excellence by securing a good proportion of their IGGSE grades at A* and A.At guidance meetings these grades can be used as strong evidence for future choices in higher education, a low grade in maths perhaps suggesting that a degree in mechanical engineering might be problematic, although of course there will be many other factors to take into account when making those choices. In addition IGCSE has for many years been successfully employed to prepare students for embarking on the DP (Ellwood 1999: 40).The MYP is less familiar. Even information on how many students follow the programme is 'limited in its usefulness and accuracy (Bunnell 2011: 263). As an overall part of the application process university admissions staff may consider MYP grades, there being the option to record these on the UCAS application form for entry to UK universities, although for most other countries it is the transcript detailing the grades achieved at the end of the last four academic years that is more important.Indeed the University of Cambridge is rare in allowing MYP grades actually to support an application. For, unlike IGGSE, the MYP was never planned as a means of accessing higher education (Stobie 2007: 145). Part of this difference lies with the MYP running broadly as a programme rather than narrowly as a curriculum. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,699
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,908

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle