MALACRIDA, Claudia, <b>COLD COMFORT: Mothers. Professionals, and Attention Deficit Disorder</b>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
MALACRIDA, Claudia, COLD COMFORT: Mothers. Professionals, and Attention Deficit Disorder. University of Toronto Press. 2003, 304pp., $27.95 softcover / $55.00 hardcover.Dr. Claudia Malacrida is a member of the faculty of the Department of Sociology at the University of Lethbridge, Alberta Canada. Her recent book titles manifest her courage to tackle painful struggles that families face. Her first book entitled. Mourning the Dreams: How Parents Create Meaning from Miscarriage, Stillbirth and Earlv infant Death (1996, Edmonton, Alberta Canada: Qual Institute Press) examines the experiences with professionals of parents who have lost a child. In her latest book, she has once again embarked on a challenging and growing concern, that of Attention Deficit (Hyperactivity) Disorder [AD(H)D]. entitled Cold Comfort.In the true spirit of sociologists - we study ourselves- Professor Malacrida asks her questions from her own mother's heart. In her prologue, she tells us of struggles with her own daughter's difficulties-not doing well in class, not connecting with classmates, needing hours of extra structure and attention to get her school work done, special classes, the teachers' suspicions of parental abuse, the continuing doses of Ritalin. She wonders how other mothers of children with AD(H)D find solace and services. The result is an interview and observational doctoral study of 34 mothers in Canada and Britain.The chapter and section titles of the book are: 1 Why Attention Deficit (Hyperactivity) Disorder, Why Mothers?: 2 Methodology; 3 British and Canadian Con(text)ual Spaces; 4 Mothers Talk about the Early Years; 5 Ideals and Actualities in Identification and Assessment; 6 Challenges and Conflicts in Treating AD(H)D; 7 Resistance, Risk, and the Chimera of Choice: Conclusion: Epilogue: and six Appendices of research materials.Malacrida interviewed a self-selected sample of 17 mothers in each country whose children were identified as having ADD or ADHD. In Chapter 1, she outlines three main goals of her study: 1 ) to understand how mothers come to terms with the diagnosis and treatment of their children; 2) to examine mothers' compliance with and resistance to medicalization. psychiatrization, and-normalization of (their] school-age children: and 3) to construct a discursive ethnography using Foucauldian discourse analysis along with feminist standpoint theory (sic, p. 17). Readers may be fairly satisfied with the sections that address the first and second goals, but not with the third. I will address each of these goals in turn, and then address other technical and substantive issues.Goal 1, Coming to terms with ADD, Diagnosis and Treatment: The book reflects the difficulties in diagnosis and intervention, mothers' frustrations and heartache-but not enough. To what extremes does ADD take these children? Alarming indications of difference are only mentioned. Setting another child's hair on fire, killing a puppy during play, late night hospital admissions (p. 155) a suicide attempt (p. 267) as well as the scenes' while shopping, in church, and at home give credence to the mothers facing something truly beyond their control. Cryptically, Malacrida tells us that at least one child bore the moniker of monster (p. 189).Mothers' ambivalence in accepting professionals' judgments challenges any researcher hoping to learn the onset of ADD (p. 154). Only 5 of the 34 mothers initiated professional interventions with their different children. In all the other instances, apparently, the mothers struggled on their own until their children were in a school or a day care setting, where teachers, and doctors began the investigation into the children's problematic behavior. Malacrida's discussion of the inter-professional inconsistencies and battles over the causes or even its realness captures the existing confusion over the disturbing phenomenon we call ADD (see Ch. 5).Despite her assertions to the contrary, the picture Malacrida gives us is one of mothers who do not have a firm grasp of their own disciplinary strategies. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,034 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».