MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2600787567 · doi:10.1353/mou.2002.0011

Lucretius and the Didactic Epic by Monica R. Gale (review)

2002· article· en· W2600787567 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Diana M. Walton

Notice bibliographique

RevueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueClassical Philosophy and Thought
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 1°3 ades as "Dionysius." In the Index of volume 3. M. Curtius Peducaeanus (p. 450) should be recipient of letter 14 I. not 14.1: and Iunia Tertia (whose name has been omitted). not Terentia (P.470). the referent in 185 (16.22).1. Rare peccadilloes aside, Shackleton Bailey's new Loeb of Cicero's complete Correspondence. offering reliable text with readable translation at reasonable price, is triply attractive. A.H. MAMOOJEE DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGES LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY THUNDER BAY, ON P7B SEI MONICA R. GALE. Lucretius and the Didactic Epic. London: Bristol Classical Press, 200 I. Pp. viii + 70. ISBN 1-85399-5776 . With this slender volume, Monica Gale offers an introduction to Lucretius suitable for readers who possess little or no knowledge of the Latin language. The sole passage from De Rerum Natura quoted in Latin (32) is from the Invocation to Venus which opens Lucretius' poem. Elsewhere, numerous passages from the DRN are rendered in literal and workman-like translations which allow Lucretius' poetic genius to shine through and illuminate Gale's text. A typical example is Gale's translation of DRN 1.259-261: "hence the new-born young gambol playfully on shaky legs over the tender grass, their young minds drunk on pure milk" (39). In her first chapter. Gale catalogues the scientific content of the DRN: Books I and 2 on theoretical physics. Books 3 and 4 on human physiology, and Books 5 and 6 on cosmology. prehistory and natural phenomena. She then tackles the question of why Lucretius chose to explain the physical nature of reality in a book of poetry. a question which arises primarily because modern readers unfamiliar with the classical tradition expect scientific matters to be discussed in prose. Gale patiently explains that ethics and science were frequently the subjects of didactic poetry in ancient literature. She calls to witness Aristophanes. Plato and Horace as proponents of the classical view that the poet is both entertainer and teacher. To further illustrate her point, Gale summons the misguided argument that modern scholars sometimes refer to Horner as the "Bible of the Greeks" (2). Gale should know that scholars who recklessly compare The Iliad and The Odyssey to the Bible are leading unsuspecting students astray: although Horner was the foremost educator of the Greeks and, as were all poets. was thought to be 104 BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS divinely inspired. his works themselves. unlike the Bible. were never considered as the revealed word of the gods. Retreating to more solid ground. Gale presents a summary of Hesiod 's Works and Days. and claims that Hellenistic poets such as Aratos are precursors of Lucretius because. like the Roman poet. they combine refined poetic artistry with a serious message borrowed from a prose source. She ends her discussion of the DRNs place in the didactic tradition by referring to Lucretius' own explanation of why he has written his work in verse: his hexameters. he says. are the "honey" of the Muses (7). the sugar-coating which makes the bitter pill of Epicurean doctrine easier for the reader to swallow. Since Lucretius' poem has survived in its entirety (albeit by virtue of a single manuscript>. whereas most of Epicurus' prose writings have vanished. it would be logical to conclude that Lucretius' poetic artistry achieved the purpose for which he claims it was designed. Yet no writer can become a poet simply by wishing to be one. however altruistic his motives. To Gale's arguments we should add the following: Lucretius wrote in poetry simply because he was born a poet. Just as a Bacchic reveller smitten by the thyrsus (1.923) must dance. so Lucretius. his heart filled with "love of the Muses" (1.925--6) is compelled to write poetry. Poetic creation. however arduous its undertaking (I. 136-45). is an occupation which brings the skilful practitioner the greatest satisfaction. and even joy (1.922-30: 4.1-10). Gale's second chapter presents an overview of Epicurean ethical and physical theories. Beginning with Epicurus' definition of pleasure as being the highest good and consisting primarily in the absence of pain. Gale warns the reader not to fall prey to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,182
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaMême sujetClassical Philosophy and ThoughtTravaux en français237 207