Quintus of Smyrna: The Trojan Epic (Posthomerica) ed. by Alan James (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
62 BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS the requirements of the meter,3 but regarded as potentially another of the poet's means of conveying to us what he wants us to feel." This is, it seems, somewhat different from "struggling" to express his feelings. Despite the few infelicities mentioned in this review, the book does admirably achieve its purpose of directing the reader~s attention to the interactions between sound, sense, and rhythm in ancient poetry. Edwards asserts in his Preface that he hopes to give teachers of Classics "renewed interest in showing their students how to translate-how best both to understand the intonations and implications of the original language and to see why it can be so difficult to reproduce it in the different norms of English idiom" (x, Edwards' italics). Edwards' renditions are successful on their own terms, and of course producing translations in the classroom is necessary when teaching ancient language and literature . But too much emphasis on writing out word-for-word translations can be counter-productive: I am reminded of the final-year undergraduate who once came to me brandishing the Creek and Latin reading list for a graduate school and asking in despair, "Are we supposed to translate all of this?" More importantly, this excellent book will undoubtedly stimulate renewed interest in showing our students how to read. Or listen. C.LC. ROBERTSON DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND 5TJOHN'S, NL AIC 557 ALAN JAMES. trans. and ed. Quintus of Smyrna: The Trojan Epic (Posthomerica). Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2004. Pp. xi + 365. ISBN 0-8018-7965-5. Alan James' translation of the Posthomerica clearly aims to be a work of scholarship as well. It begins with an extensive Introduction and Select Bibliography. The Critical Summary following the translation provides a general introduction to each book as well as a summary by sections of the contents of each book (almost 30 pages) There follows a Commentary (ca. 80 pages) and an Index of Names. I shall consider these ancillary sections before taking up the translation. The Introduction gives information on the Cyclic epics and their re3 Again (see previous note). this aspect of the poetry has hardly been discussed atall. BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS lationship to the Iliad and Odyssey (xi-xviD. and then to Quintus himself (xvii-xxi). James is particularly interested in Quintus' background and date. Was Quintus a shepherd. or is he merely following Hesiod? Did he live in Smyrna. as the "ostensibly autobiographical passage at 12.306- I 3" suggests, or is he following Homer? James thinks he was from Smyrna. Here as with the fairly detailed presentation of evidence for Quintus' date the question arises: for whom is this translation-or translation and edition as James has it-intended? The Commentary at least is intended for" nonspecialist readers" (viii). There is also more of the technical and philological. and less of the literary, than translations usually provide. And so, when James' discussion of the Character of the Trojan Epic (xxi-xxix) deals with meter. we learn that Quintus ignores Kallimachos' refinements and follows Homeric practice, but is more dactylic than Homer. The treatment of oral poetry is heavy on numbers and statistics: 550/0 of heroic names in Horner are with an epithet, 370/0 in Quintus: the Iliad is 44% speech, the Odyssey 560/0. Quintus 240/0. and so on. For similes, surely an opportunity for literary comment, we learn of frequency and clustering, of subject matter, and of the percentage (100/0) that are original (xxv-xxvi). The heroes get short shrift: we learn that they are idealized. Divine intervention is far less common than in Homer (xxvii-xxviii). Stoic philosophy-generally in the form of moral maxims-is thought to contribute to the idealization of characters (xxviii-xxix). When Achilles' ghost appears to Neoptolemos, delivers a long list of old saws (don't be too sad when things go bad, or too happy when you're lucky: human beings are like grass, etc.), provides advice on scaling the Tree of Virtue, advises Neoptolemos to be gentle, and in the next breath orders the sacrifice to Polyxena at his tomb (14.179...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».