MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2601885171

Depression to Decolonization: Barclays Bank (DCO) in the West Indies, 1926-1962

2011· article· en· W2601885171 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carl C. Campbell

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDecolonizationWest indiesDepression (economics)RecessionDilemmaGreat DepressionEconomic historyMedicineEconomyHistoryPoliticsEthnologyArchaeologyLawPolitical scienceEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Kathleen Monteith, Depression to Decolonization: Barclays Bank (DCO) in the West Indies, 1926-1962, Kingston: University of the West Indies Press, 2008, 355 pp.This book discusses the operations of Barclays Bank (DCO) in the British West Indies between 1926 and 1962. Jamaicans might well be aware that the National Commercial Bank (NCB), one of the largest banks currently operating in the island, evolved from Barclays. The book is indeed timely, since it comes at a time of global recession caused by the crash of the world banking industry. Interestingly enough, Barclays Bank in England was one of the very few banks that did not collapse. There is no doubt that the traditional conservative banking practices as discussed in this work contributed to its surviving this dilemma.Depression to Decolonization ia most unattractive title) is undoubtedly a path-breaking work, in that it is the first major academic business history of a commercial bank in the region, thus expanding the scope of West Indian economic history into the field of business history. It is a solid, comprehensive and definitive assessment of Barclays Bank (DCO) in the West Indies; and it is inconceivable that any future historian could replace it without regaining rare access to the Barclays Bank Archives. Although it has no single astounding contention this book looks set to become a West Indian classic, and by it Monteith has established herself as a leading business historian of the Caribbean.The analysis is divided into three broad time periods: 1837-1926; 1926-1940 and 1940-1962. The first period marks the formative years of banking in the British West Indies, the second marks the entry and early years of Barclays Bank (DCO) then the largest multinational bank in the world, in the region. The third period marks the beginning of the gradual march of the British West Indies to self-government and independence. The year 1962, the terminal date, marks the coming of political independence in Jamaica and Trinidad, and the advent of the central banks (the Bank of Jamaica, for example). In 1926, what emerged as Barclays Bank was the incorporation of other banks, chief of which was the Colonial Bank that had existed in the West Indies from 1837, the year before the emancipation of the enslaved blacks in the British Caribbean. Hence the discourse quite fittingly begins at 1837. The Colonial Bank, unregulated except by its own charter from England, began operation as a trade bank giving only short-term loans on easily convertible securities to British merchants trading to the West Indies and also to wealthy West Indian merchants and planters, primarily sugar planters. Gradually it evolved into a commercial bank extending longterm loans to large plantation enterprises; small peasant farmers were not considered suitable clients for loans.By very cautious, conservative banking practices and policies, and prudent and skilful management, the Colonial Bank survived the financial difficulties of the nineteenth century and withstood competition from Canadian Banks (Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada) that had now entered the island to capture some of the business arising from the expansion in West Indian trade to Canada and the United States of America. Indeed the failure of indigenous banks, such as the Planters Bank in Jamaica and the West India Bank in Barbados around the same time as the Colonial Bank, as Monteith notes was a result of their being undercapitalized, poorly organized and managed, and physically far from the movers and shakers of colonial policy in London. The incorporation of the Colonial Bank into Barclays Bank Ltd in 1926, based on Monteith's interpretation, was more a strategic move of a successful bank than the convulsive gasp of a failed institution reeling under intense competition.Incidentally this might be the place to say that this book provides some very clear explanations of the economics of trade between the West Indies and the metropole; how it was organized and financed; how changing metropolitan tariff policies pulled down or propped up the sugar industry in these islands; and without the sugar industry iat least down to the 1950s and leaving aside oil in Trinidad) the bank would have had little or nothing to fatten on in these islands. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,249
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,495

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,003
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetCaribbean history, culture, and politicsTravaux en français237 207