Stress at the place of work and cognitive functions among women performing intellectual work during peri- and post-menopausal period
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
perspectives for years [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], relatively little is known about the situation of working women with menopausal symptoms.Since most of women remain professionally active in their fifties and sixties, we have to consider the effect of menopause on work capability and work performance.This problem seems to be important also from the perspective of aging societies and speculation on the need of extending the period of work activity.In the context of work, 2 issues related to menopausal transition seem to be of special importance: the effect of stress and menopausal status on cognitive functioning. Stress and cognitive functionsstructural and functional connectionsTo simplify the problem, it may be accepted that cognitive functions concern the processes taking place in the brain, related to the receipt, storage, transformation, and further passing of information acquired from the environment.According to Nęcka et al., cognitive processes may be divided into elementary (attention and awareness, cognitive control, perception, memory, memory activities), and complex (thinking and reasoning, problem Abstract Objectives: The analysis of the relationship between stress at work and results of cognitive functions amongst women, at peri-and post-menopausal age, performing intellectual work.Material and Methods: The study group included women, aged 45-66 years old, employed as intellectual workers.Research instruments were: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment; computer tests of the CNS Vital Signs; the Subjective Work Characteristics Questionnaire, and a questionnaire designed by the author.The results were statistically analyzed.Results: Nearly a half of respondents experienced high stress at the place of work; 1/3 -on the average level, on a low level -every fifth.The largest number of respondents experienced stress caused by social contacts.Among a half of the women, stress was caused by the lack of awards at work, followed by the lack of support.Slightly fewer of them experienced stress caused by the feeling of psychological load related to the complexity of work or the feeling of uncertainty caused by the organization of work.Every third woman experienced stress due to the sense of responsibility or the lack of control.The smallest number experienced stress caused by physical arduousness, the sense of threat and unpleasant working conditions.The examined women obtained the best results with respect to simple attention, the worst results -with respect to the reaction time.The results concerning the remaining 9 cognitive functions were ranked in the middle of the aforementioned results.The intensity of stress at work and factors which caused this stress, negatively correlated with simple attention of women in the early peri-menopausal period, while positively correlating with the psychomotor and processing speed of women in the late peri-menopausal period.Among the post-menopausal women, negative correlations were observed between the majority of cognitive functions and the intensity of stress at work, and the majority of factors which caused this stress.Conclusions: Cognitive functions of the examined women remained within the range of average evaluations, and were correlated with stress-inducing factors at the place of work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».