MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W260240794

Julius Caesar: Presented by Single Thread Theatre Company at Chernoff Hall, Kingston, Ontario

2004· article· en· W260240794 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jenn Stephenson

Notice bibliographique

RevueShakespeare bulletin · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyPoliticsCorporationFraming (construction)Performance artArtMedia studiesManagementHistorySociologyLawArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Julius Caesar Presented by Single Thread Theatre Company at Chernoff Hall, Kingston, Ontario. October 1-5, 2003. Directed by Jonathan Langley. Assistant director Kimberley McLeod. Dramaturgy by Liam Karry. Costumes by Robin Willis. Sound by Paul Hopson. Media by Ryan Graham. With Liam Karry (Caesar), Michael Rode (Brutus), Graham Kosakoski (Antony), Andrei Drooz (Cassius), Maggie Blake (Portia), Kate Hodgert (Calphurnia), Ashleigh Rains (Decius), Simon Cheung (Casca), Phil Borg (Cinna), Amber Mills (Lucius), Aaron Stern (Octavius), Drew Mitchell (Publius), Dave Messer (Pindarus), Kevin Millington (Soothsayer), Aaron Guravich (Lepidus), Steph Lang (Artemidorus), Jessi Linn Taylor (Tour Guide), and others. Transposing Rome of the first century BC to Rome the ultramodern pharmaceutical research and development corporation, this contemporary-dress production made innovative use of found space in and around Chernoff Hall, the newly built chemistry building on the campus of Queen's University. The unusual choice of venue is typical of Single Thread Theatre Company. This is a company that has an interest in presenting classical works in non-traditional spaces and in nontraditional arrangements. In this case, the decision to mount the show in Chernoff Hall had a significant impact on the mise en scene as it related to the theme of political ambition as emphasized in the production. To reflect on this theme, cinematic techniques of framing were applied in the theater. By manipulating the gaze of the audience through careful staging of the actors in concert with the architectural environment, the theme of the appropriate scale of the human was continually foregrounded. The play began with the audience being hustled outside to greet the arrival of Caesar and his entourage in a black SUV. The visual track of the audience began at the top of a long flight of stairs and a broad walkway running parallel to the building down to the road, easily seventy-five meters away. We first saw Caesar at this distance. In this long shot, the human figures emerging from the vehicles were framed against the backdrop of the surrounding buildings, the road, and the lake behind. As the audience hurried down the steps, the actors came briskly towards us, shrinking the distance as the shot zoomed in. When they brushed past us, the frame panned to a reverse shot of these retreating forms and we ran to follow them. Back inside for the next scene, the scope of the visual frame changed radically. Contained between the glass doors leading outside and the atrium railing, we were compelled by the space to cluster together and view Brutus and Cassius drinking coffee in medium close-up, as we peered between or over the shoulders of those in front. Although set at a very unusual proximity for theater audiences accustomed to a greater viewing the intimate scale of the scene, so typical of Hollywood films, illustrated its very ordinariness: two men discussing office politics at the coffee station. In these two juxtaposed initial scenes, Caesar and Brutus were framed quite differently in terms of their relationship to the audience and to the architectural environment. Without professing a firm conclusion, the production used opposing visual scales to immediately frame our consideration of the ambitions of these powerful men. In addition to the manipulation of distance, the mise en scene of this production also made use of something like camera angle to further interrogate the question of individual influence and the correct limits of political power in a collective, corporate context. The central space of Chernoff Hall is a truncated oval-shaped multilevel atrium, reminiscent of a Roman amphitheater in glass, polished metal, and blond wood. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,370
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0270,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueShakespeare bulletinMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207