MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2602579280 · doi:10.1093/pch/21.2.65

Time to reconsider routine high-dose amoxicillin for community-acquired pneumonia in all Canadian children

2016· article· en· W2602579280 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Nipunie Rajapakse, Joseph Vayalumkal, Otto G. Vanderkooi, Leah J. Ricketson, James D. Kellner

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Établissements canadiensAlberta Health ServicesAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAmoxicillinPneumoniaMedicineCommunity-acquired pneumoniaIntensive care medicinePediatricsInternal medicineAntibioticsMicrobiologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common reasons for hospitalization in otherwise healthy Canadian children. The introduction of effective vaccinations, such as the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, to the routine immunization schedule, has led to decreased rates of illness and, possibly, changes in the epidemiology of CAP in Canada. Unfortunately, in many children diagnosed with pneumonia, no causative agent can be isolated and up to date local data regarding the most common causes of pneumonia are difficult to obtain. The 2011 national guideline from the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) (1) and international guideline from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2) recommend high-dose amoxicillin as the first-line treatment for otherwise healthy children with CAP who can be treated with oral antibiotics (1,2). This recommendation was initiated before the widespread introduction of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to immunization schedules, when penicillin-resistant serotype 19A disease was a rising concern. We sought to determine the appropriateness of this recommendation in our setting based on our current local Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptibility patterns. Data regarding the etiology of CAP in Canadian children, especially outpatients, are limited. Most data that are available are outdated and were collected before pneumococcal vaccines were introduced to the routine immunization schedule in Canada in the early 2000s. A recent, active, population-based surveillance study in the United States detected ≥1 viruses in 66% of children admitted to hospital with CAP, as well as ≥1 bacteria in 8% and both bacterial and viral pathogens in 7% (3). The most common causes of pneumonia in infants and preschool children are viruses (eg, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, human metapneumovirus, influenza) (3–8). With the exception of influenza, viruses are less likely to be the sole cause of pneumonia in older children (9). Before the widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, epidemiological studies cited S pneumoniae as the most commonly documented bacterial pathogen in children with CAP, with the organism isolated from 4% to 44% of all children examined (4–12). More recent studies suggest that the incidence of bacterial pneumonia is now lower, likely owing to the success of conjugate vaccines, and changes in laboratory sampling and diagnostic methods (3). Among bacteria, S pneumoniae was, and may still be, the most significant pathogen in children of all ages (1,3,10). Empirical oral antimicrobial therapy is selected to provide effective treatment for the bacterial pathogens most likely to cause CAP, with particular emphasis on S pneumoniae. If left untreated or treated inadequately, S pneumoniae may lead to serious sequelae including empyema, sepsis and, rarely, death (13). The 2011 CPS's practice point, “Pneumonia in healthy Canadian children and youth: Practice points for management” (1), recommends high-dose oral amoxicillin (75 mg/kg/day to 100 mg/kg/day divided three times per day) or intravenous ampicillin for most cases of nonsevere pneumonia. As described in the practice point, the primary goal is to offer good coverage for S pneumoniae. The most current CPS guideline indicates a dosage range of 40 mg/kg/day to 90 mg/kg/day and does not provide recommendations on when to use high dose (14). The Infectious Diseases Society of America's guideline, “The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age” (2), was published in July 2011. It recommends that high-dose amoxicillin (90 mg/kg/day divided two times per day) be used as first-line therapy for previously healthy, appropriately immunized infants and children with mild to moderate CAP suspected to be of bacterial origin. Amoxicillin is the most common antibiotic prescribed by primary care providers in Canada (15). There are no randomized controlled trials examining clinical outcomes of high-dose versus standard-dose amoxicillin for treatment of CAP in Canada or the United States (16). The Infectious Diseases Society of America's recommendation for the routine use of high-dose amoxicillin is based on expert opinion due to concerns regarding the emergence of the antibiotic-resistant serotype 19A strain of S pneumoniae after the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (this serotype was not covered by this vaccine). This recommendation has not been re-evaluated since the introduction of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (which provides coverage for serotype 19A) into the routine immunization schedule in the United States and Canada. Population-based surveillance of invasive and lower respiratory tract S pneumoniae infections has been conducted in the Calgary area since January 1, 1998, by the Calgary Streptococcus pneumoniae Epidemiology Research (CASPER) surveillance system (17). The surveillance system covers an estimated population of 1.3 million individuals. Susceptibility data for S pneumoniae isolates from all invasive and lower respiratory tract specimens collected from adults and children from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014 were reviewed. The most common lower respiratory tract specimens included endotracheal tube aspirates (46%), broncheoalveolar lavage (26%) and sputum samples (21%). The majority of invasive isolates (isolated from a normally sterile site) were found in blood (86%), with cerebrospinal fluid (4%) and pleural fluid (4%) the next most common sources. Amoxicillin susceptibility testing (E-test) was only performed on isolates with a penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >0.12 µg/mL. Isolates with penicillin MIC ≤0.12 µg/mL are susceptible to amoxicillin. Of note, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revised the penicillin breakpoints for S pneumoniae in 2008 because treatment with standard doses of penicillin were found to be effective for the treatment of noncentral nervous system infections. Of 1234 isolates tested, only 8 (0.6%) were found to have intermediate resistance to amoxicillin and none were found to be resistant (Table 1). Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptibility to amoxicillin from all paediatric and adult invasive and lower respiratory tract specimens in Calgary, alberta from 2008 to 2014 Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated. MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptibility to amoxicillin from all paediatric and adult invasive and lower respiratory tract specimens in Calgary, alberta from 2008 to 2014 Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated. MIC Minimum inhibitory concentration Despite the recommendations in the 2011 national and international guidelines, review of our local S pneumoniae resistance rates suggest that high-dose amoxicillin is unnecessary for the treatment of mild to moderate CAP in most children in our area. Special consideration may need to be given to children with risk factors associated with resistant S pneumoniae (eg, antimicrobial use in the past three months, unimmunized or incompletely immunized, daycare attendance) who may be at higher risk for infection with resistant S pneumoniae serotypes. Although amoxicillin is generally well tolerated among children, the unjustified use of higher doses (double the standard dose) leads to increased costs, side effects (eg, gastrointestinal symptoms) and total antibiotic exposure. Harmful effects on the patient's microbiome should be considered as well. Using the minimum appropriate duration of antibiotic treatment for mild to moderate pneumonia would further help to mitigate some of these effects. The 2011 guidelines suggest a duration of seven days is adequate in most cases (1,2). These findings highlight the importance of incorporating local data, where available, into treatment guidelines, especially when local variations in susceptibility patterns may exist. Clinicians should be familiar with their local antibiograms and use this valuable resource when making decisions about antimicrobial prescribing. We encourage other communities across the country to review their local epidemiology and determine whether high-dose amoxicillin is truly required as first-line therapy in children with CAP in their setting. The authors acknowledge Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI) for providing funding for Dr Rajapakse's research fellowship.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,123
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,247

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsTravaux en français237 207