MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2602785779

Therapeutic Visiting in Treatment Foster Care

2014· article· en· W2602785779 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sally Palmer, Duane Durham, Margaret Osmond

Notice bibliographique

RevueChild welfare · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChild Welfare and Adoption
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeelingFoster careFoster parentsMedicineFoster Home CarePsychologyPerceptionNursingFamily medicineSuicide preventionPoison controlSocial psychologyMedical emergency
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A young woman who grew up in foster care recalled her own feelings and those of other children who moved in and out of her foster home: ...all they want is who really cares. (Kahan, 1979, p. 112). When we consider outcomes for children living in out-of-home care, we tend to focus on objective variables such as placement stability, behavior, and school performance rather than on children's perception that someone really about them. It is a universal human need to want someone who really about us-and often an unmet need for children living apart from their families.Most children who are taken away from their are moved several times in care, which can leave them feeling as though they don't belong In Ontario, a 2007 study of children in long-term care (two consecutive years or more) found that 43% stayed in their first foster home, 22% had two placements, and 35% had three or more placements.Although foster caregivers may become attached to children in their homes, it is difficult to continue the relationship when the child leaves and another comes to fill the bed. Thus, a child's best hope for somebody who really cares is their or other family members. Most children in foster care will return to their families sooner or later: a California study that followed children in care over a three-year period found that almost 80% returned home during this time (Courtney, 1994). Children who are deprived of family visiting during placement may be expected to have a more difficult time reintegrating with their families.Attachment Feelings in Children Separated from their FamiliesChild welfare workers and caregivers for children who were neglected or abused by their birth families are likely to overlook or minimize the strength of children's attachments to their families. Yet we know from attachment theory and caregivers' experiences that children tend to maintain their emotional ties to neglectful or abusive (Anderson, 2013; Bowlby, 1982). Even children who lack the capacity for attachment have a need to understand why they are living apart from their and what they may expect of their families in the future.Children in out-of-home care are at risk of identity confusion and diminished self-esteem; especially when they lose their connections with family, their sense of self is likely to be compromised. A teenager in foster care, David, expressed this in a letter to his social worker after a reunion with long-lost relatives. He had entered care at 13 after the second of his caregiving grandparents died and said, never felt that I belonged anywhere. After meeting his other grandparents and relatives, he wrote, feel as though I belong now, and that I am and that is the best feeling anyone could have in this situation (Laird, 1979, p. 186).Children's self esteem is also threatened by living in out-of-home care, especially if they have little or no contact with their families. They are likely to blame themselves for the separation, feeling confused and guilty about how their lives have unfolded. These feelings are likely to undermine children's sense of security and their healthy development during placement. Child welfare workers and caregivers should seek opportunities for helping children in care to resolve their confusion and guilt about their families (Palmer, 1995).Research on the Effects of Involving Parents in PlacementStudies of parental contact with children in out-of-home care have shown that low and uneven levels of engagement are pervasive, and services to and children tend to be separated, leaving important opportunities for parent-child intervention underutilized. (Kemp, Marcenko, Hoagwood, & Vesnecki, 2009, p.101).Children who are hard-to-serve are likely to be moved into group care, where the staff often treats them as though they will not be returning home: Residential treatment providers can get in a mind frame that they are [the youths'] parents (Blau et al. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,819
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,539

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChild welfareMême sujetChild Welfare and AdoptionTravaux en français237 207