MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2602908169

Global growth agendas: regions, institutions and sustainability

2015· preprint· en· W2602908169 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicola Francesco Dotti

Notice bibliographique

RevueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2015
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueRegional Development and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSustainabilityLibrary sciencePolitical scienceLatin AmericansPublic administrationPublic relationsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IntroductionThe 2015 Regional Studies Association (RSA) Conference took place in Piacenza (Italy) from 25-27 April, under the theme 'Global Growth Agendas: Regions, Institutions and Sustainability'. The conference was hosted by the 'Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore' gathering both academics and policymakers. In an intense 3-day programme, with plenary sessions focused on three main topics: well-being and quality of life, technological and social innovation, and food, agriculture and regional development. These topics were chosen in the framework of the 2015 EXPO organised in Milano to address the challenge of 'Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life'. Piacenza provided a concrete example to combine quality of life and economic development in a medium sized city with about 100,000 inhabitants. In order to introduce the conference, the RSA in cooperation with Taylor and Francis prepared a review of recent articles from Italian scholars.1 This conference confirmed the growing activities of the RSA, announcing the first Chinese conference (November 2015) and a new division for Latin America as well as new funding schemes.Conference organisation and main contributionsThe RSA conference is an excellent opportunity to gather scholars and policymakers discussing regional issues in a very friendly environment, enabling scientific discussions and exchange of ideas. Despite a growing number of participants, the RSA conference remains a place where contacts are easy and cross-disciplinary fertilisations possible. The 2015 RSA conference focused on the twenty themes presented in Table 1. Within a very rich program, this report focuses primarily on plenary sessions where prominent scholars and experts addressed three main topics.2Well-being and quality of lifeIn the first plenary session, Philip S. Morrison (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand), Filomena Maggino (Universita degli Studi di Firenze, Italy) and John Helliwell (Vancouver School of Economics, Canada) discussed different dimensions of well-being and quality of life from an urban perspective, focusing on difficulties in providing indicators.In the first presentation, Morrison started from the observation that well-being varies across cities and countries. The first remark is that in the developed world well-being seems to be associated with smaller urban size; whereas, in the developing world, this relationship is reversed. This introduces a paradox because, in the developed world, large urban areas are the engine of growth, but with lower well-being. Second, the distribution of well-being within urban areas varies significantly. Using a microeconomic approach, Morrison argued that well-being varies depending on absolute and relative income, as well as age, gender and other dimensions that need to be explored by future research.Maggino presented a project entitled 'Benessere, Equo, Sostenibile' (BES),3 led by ISTAT, the Italian statistical institute. This project aims to select and collect a broad array of indicators on 'well-being, equity, and sustainability' (corresponding to the Italian acronym 'BES') through a participative process, which involves universities, institutional stakeholders and experts. The major challenge is how to operationalise concepts like individual quality of life, social and community development as well as risks and resilience for sustainability. An interesting side project is the development of indicators for Italian metropolitan systems.In the third contribution, Helliwell started his presentation asking the audience to sing. By this very entertaining introduction, he showed the influence of emotions on the perception of life, as determined by the funny and unusual situation. He highlighted another paradox: certain disasters, such as an earthquake, can push people to cooperate and develop generosity, helping them to recover from the disaster and significantly improving their perceptions and well-being. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,700
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,093
Tête enseignante GPT0,415
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsMême sujetRegional Development and PolicyTravaux en français237 207