Speaking Up and Speaking Out: Working for Social and Environmental Justice through Parks, Recreation, and Leisure
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Speaking Up and Speaking Out: Working Social and Environmental Justice through Parks, Recreation, and Leisure edited by Karen Paisley and Daniel Dustln Sagamore Publishing LLC, 2011This book should be part of every park, recreation, and leisure programme, and central in the continuing education of parks, recreation, and leisure (PRL) professionals. It's that important a topic, and that well created a book. Parks move- ments typically began in order to provide access to all strata in society. Now we face mounting social inequality. Addressing problems of social equity and envi- ronmental sustainability is key to high quality of life now and into the future. It is also, of course, a question of fairness. Reams of research have shown that environ- mental degradation is associated with social injustices and inequality. Speaking Up and Speaking Out superbly demonstrates how to and why to work for social and environmental in the parks, recreation, and leisure field. It is also the rare book that is accessible to all levels from undergraduate to seasoned professional.Speaking Up and Speaking Out starts with personal accounts of emerging aware- ness of social inequality. Later sections move into practical yet well-researched accounts of justice and sustainability work in various types of PRL practice. The book is organized in three sections: Know Thyself, Those We Serve, and Serv- ing without Othering. With this framework, the editors demonstrate that service can be imposition and reproduce injustice unless it is done carefully and with full knowledge of one's presumptions and the lived experience of recreation partici- pants.Diane Samdahl's chapter illustrates most of these features. In What Can 'American Beach' Teach Us? Samdahl writes about the growth of a resort town that took over an historic African-American community on the Florida coast. Un- til I accidently learned about American Beach, I had never paired the history of the recreation movement with the parallel history of enforced segregation that prevented a large segment of our population from accessing public parks and rec- reation facilities (p. 83). The case is well explained and accompanied by Sam- dahl's honest appraisal of her lack of knowledge which she then uses to talk about privileged status as a white person. The chapter starts with race and ends with social class and a variety of dimensions of inequality are highlighted.While appropriate undergraduates, the book will also push long-time prac- titioners to new attention to social disadvantages and their personal and profes- sional involvement. The chapters sequence in such a way as to scaffold a learning process. Each chapter also ends with five or so questions discussion in a class or that can serve professionals as checkpoints on their practice. Chapters often refer to other chapters, meaning the book comes across as a collective effort. Readers should be aware, however, that the book is entirely North American. Race features prominently in many chapters, although the U.S. and Canadian experiences on this topic are quite different. Other facets of social disadvantage, inequality, and environmental degradation are also featured throughout.The chapters rarely point fingers; this is not a book that guilt trips readers. The authors take pains, as Samdahl did, to recount their own stories. Whether it is from the vantage of social privilege (such as an elite professor) or someone who has personally experienced racism, homophobia, or other discrimination, the personal accounts and scholarship are well integrated in accessible writing. Editors Dustin and Paisley are to be praised their leadership in crafting such a well-modulated collection.One of the chapters most often referred to by other contributors is Erin Sharpe's Are You Awake Yet? Sharpe details the conscientization process of learning about, internalizing, and acting on social differences, discriminations, and one's own place in the world. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle