MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2603313199

Speaking Up and Speaking Out: Working for Social and Environmental Justice through Parks, Recreation, and Leisure

2012· article· en· W2603313199 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Randolph Haluza‐DeLay

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Leisure Research · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRecreationInjusticeSociologyLeisure studiesPublic relationsSustainabilityPolitical sciencePsychologySocial psychologyLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Speaking Up and Speaking Out: Working Social and Environmental Justice through Parks, Recreation, and Leisure edited by Karen Paisley and Daniel Dustln Sagamore Publishing LLC, 2011This book should be part of every park, recreation, and leisure programme, and central in the continuing education of parks, recreation, and leisure (PRL) professionals. It's that important a topic, and that well created a book. Parks move- ments typically began in order to provide access to all strata in society. Now we face mounting social inequality. Addressing problems of social equity and envi- ronmental sustainability is key to high quality of life now and into the future. It is also, of course, a question of fairness. Reams of research have shown that environ- mental degradation is associated with social injustices and inequality. Speaking Up and Speaking Out superbly demonstrates how to and why to work for social and environmental in the parks, recreation, and leisure field. It is also the rare book that is accessible to all levels from undergraduate to seasoned professional.Speaking Up and Speaking Out starts with personal accounts of emerging aware- ness of social inequality. Later sections move into practical yet well-researched accounts of justice and sustainability work in various types of PRL practice. The book is organized in three sections: Know Thyself, Those We Serve, and Serv- ing without Othering. With this framework, the editors demonstrate that service can be imposition and reproduce injustice unless it is done carefully and with full knowledge of one's presumptions and the lived experience of recreation partici- pants.Diane Samdahl's chapter illustrates most of these features. In What Can 'American Beach' Teach Us? Samdahl writes about the growth of a resort town that took over an historic African-American community on the Florida coast. Un- til I accidently learned about American Beach, I had never paired the history of the recreation movement with the parallel history of enforced segregation that prevented a large segment of our population from accessing public parks and rec- reation facilities (p. 83). The case is well explained and accompanied by Sam- dahl's honest appraisal of her lack of knowledge which she then uses to talk about privileged status as a white person. The chapter starts with race and ends with social class and a variety of dimensions of inequality are highlighted.While appropriate undergraduates, the book will also push long-time prac- titioners to new attention to social disadvantages and their personal and profes- sional involvement. The chapters sequence in such a way as to scaffold a learning process. Each chapter also ends with five or so questions discussion in a class or that can serve professionals as checkpoints on their practice. Chapters often refer to other chapters, meaning the book comes across as a collective effort. Readers should be aware, however, that the book is entirely North American. Race features prominently in many chapters, although the U.S. and Canadian experiences on this topic are quite different. Other facets of social disadvantage, inequality, and environmental degradation are also featured throughout.The chapters rarely point fingers; this is not a book that guilt trips readers. The authors take pains, as Samdahl did, to recount their own stories. Whether it is from the vantage of social privilege (such as an elite professor) or someone who has personally experienced racism, homophobia, or other discrimination, the personal accounts and scholarship are well integrated in accessible writing. Editors Dustin and Paisley are to be praised their leadership in crafting such a well-modulated collection.One of the chapters most often referred to by other contributors is Erin Sharpe's Are You Awake Yet? Sharpe details the conscientization process of learning about, internalizing, and acting on social differences, discriminations, and one's own place in the world. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,083

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0090,006
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0250,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,271
Tête enseignante GPT0,450
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations29
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Leisure ResearchMême sujetUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesTravaux en français237 207