Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cambridge Companion * Jonathan E. Brockopp (Ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010 * 326 pp. * ISBN 978-0-521-88607-9 (HB) * 978-0-521-71372-6 (PB) Europeans and Western people are making research on every subject ... except the personality of Sayyidina Muhammad, salla Allahu 'alayhi wa-sallam Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani in khutbat al-Jumu'a at the First International Islamic Unity Conference in Los Angeles on August 2, 1996. Cambridge Companion is a collection of fourteen essays introduced by Judaism and Islam in practice: A Sourcebook author Jonathan E. Brockopp and written, the cover blurb informs us, to engage and inform. readers coming the subject for the first time. essays are presented in three parts respectively entitled Muhammad in world (three historico-biographical essays and the book's most relevant part), Muhammad in (six monographical essays on his legacy as a law maker, philosopher, and politician), and Muhammad in memory (five essays on how has been remembered. in biography, prose, poetry ... film and fiction) by professors active in university departments of religion, theology, Islamic studies, Arabic studies, Asian and African studies, near eastern languages and civilizations, and history in the US (9), Israel (2), the UK(1), Canada (1), and France (1). Of all the contributions in this volume University of Exeter Arabist and expert on legal theory Robert Gleave's article in Part Two (pp. 103-122), Personal piety (a misnomer), on the juristic hadith-based determination of obligation versus mere desirability and whether the Prophet can make mistakes, impressed me for its fair tone and general accuracy--even if he adduces four forgeries in its first three pages. rest do not live up the promise of the title nor do they rise Shaykh Nazim's challenge, leaving seekers of a true vade mecum defrauded. In 1982 Salah al-Din al-Munajjid published a 400-page sourcebook of works about the Messenger of Allah (Miijam ma ullifa Qan Rasulillah) in twelve sections of up twenty-one sub-sections each, documenting the massive tradition of hadith, sira, shama'il, khasa'is, dala'il, nasab, tarikh and the interactive/paradigmatic manuals of mawalid, salawat, and mada'ih among other aspects of the study of the Prophet. It is disappointing that, thirty years later, a work purporting be an English-language guide the same subject that gave rise such a still-growing mine of published material is only a festschrift offering snapshots often devoid of relevance its subject-matter. Worse, the Cambridge Companion is a faithless one in three senses: 1. It maintains a wall of separation between itself and its supposed company, whom it distrusts as it does all of hadith, sira, and tafsir: By portraying the law as a well-designed series of rationally explainable interactions between the Qur'an and the Sunna, the role of the Sunna was made seem not only integral but absolutely indispensable the structure of the law (Joseph E. Lowry, p. 87; emphasis added). Muhammad's biographies should not be classified as history books ... among Muslims, the[ir] popularity ... is based not on the historical evidence that they include but on their didactic, edifying, propagandistic, and entertaining features that address the needs of readers and listeners on various educational, psychological, and artistic levels. Had it not been for those features, the biographies would have been forgotten or marginalized long ago. (Michael Lecker, p. 63) The post-Qur'anic sources read back sira events into the Qur'an because [p]ost-Qur'anic Muslims needed a hero who could be venerated.... a new Muhammad, a person blessed with powers that he still lacked in the Qur'an and that bridged the gap between him and the previous prophets. (Uri Rubin, p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,290 | 0,145 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».