MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2603386643

Potash: An Inside Account of Saskatchewan's Pink Gold

2016· article· en· W2603386643 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Eleanor D. Glor

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œinnovation journal · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMining and Resource Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInsiderPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)EndowmentNothingSociologyPolitical sciencePublic administrationEconomicsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

John BurtonPotash: An Inside Account of Saskatchewan's Pink GoldRegina, Canada: University of Regina Press, 2014Reviewed by Eleanor D. GlorDuring the past 21 years, this journal has addressed many innovations and some innovative governments. None of the articles and books has detailed the innovativeness and innovations of these governments to the extent that the Government of Saskatchewan, Canada, has been documented (e.g. Harding, 1995; Glor, 1997, 2002; Pitsula & Rasmussen, 1990; Baron and Jackson, 1991; Biggs and Stobbe, 1991). Some might think there is nothing more to be said about this highly innovative government, but they would be wrong.Potash is a unique insider's look at the unprecedented purchase by the Government of Saskatchewan of forty per cent of the province's potash mining capacity in 1975 and subsequent years. It is not, however, a one-sided, partisan look at the issues, strategies and developments. Rather, it is a balanced, nuanced and dramatic description of the public sector attempting to assure that the people of Saskatchewan secured adequate returns on their resource and economic development from their enormously rich endowment of pink gold. At the same time, while it carefully describes the positions of those who favoured the innovation, it also attempts to understand and describes the positions of those who were opposed to this strategy.The book is of interest not only for its outlining of this inventive and strategic policy but also because of its clear description of the political and administrative tactics and administrative tools used to conceptualize, legislate and implement the policy. It likewise provides key evaluative measures.John Burton has been a public servant or consultant most of his life, but he also spent four years as an elected member of the national Parliament of Canada. He has a keen mind and a deft pen and adds enough personal material to make this book a real page turner.Saskatchewan was a poor province during most of its history, dependent on agriculture and a small amount of primary industry that suffered from severe ups and downs in prices and production. A Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) farmer-labour social democratic government was elected in 1944 and remained in power until 1964. It attempted to improve the provincial economy by investing in a sodium sulfate mine and steel, box and boot factories. The precedent had thus been set.The Allan Blakeney New Democratic Party (NDP), the successor to the CCF, was elected in 1971 and remained in office until 1982. It sought to diversify the economy through development of its rich natural resources, including oil, forestry, coal, uranium and potash. Potash production began in Saskatchewan in 1962. At the time his government was elected, Saskatchewan had 10 producing potash mines (Appendix B). Potash is a key ingredient in agricultural fertilizers; its price and production tends to move in cycles. The previous government had initiated a supply control system which disadvantaged Saskatchewan potash as provider of last resort. World demand was, however, increasing and windfall profits were being made and about to increase substantially.The Saskatchewan innovations of the early 1970s were a potash reserve tax (in effect, a land tax), a requirement that potash companies submit their financial statements (so that the government could understand the industry better), higher taxes on production, and some other measures. The province also provided the industry with a number of benefits, including infrastructure, research, special grants and loans, support in creating a marketing agency, etc. (page 83).The potash producers resisted these measures and, following the 1975 reelection of the government, brought court cases against the provincial government. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,818
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,198

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œinnovation journalMême sujetMining and Resource ManagementTravaux en français237 207