Strengthening the Creative Transformational Leadership of Primary School Teachers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research and development aimed to: 1) study the components and indicators of creative transformational leadership of primary school teachers; 2) study the existing situation, and the desirable situation of creative transformational leadership of primary school teachers in the northeastern region of Thailand; 3) develop a program to strengthen creative transformational leadership of primary school teachers; 4) study the results of implementing the strengthening of the creative transformational leadership program of primary school teachers. The research instruments are comprised of: 1) a form for evaluation components and indicators of creative transformational leadership; 2) a questionnaire for the existing situation and the desirable situation; 3) a form for the assessment of the program to strengthen the creative transformational leadership of primary school teachers; 4) a form for evaluating the results of implementing creative transformational leadership; 5) a test of creative transformational leadership. The research found that: The creative transformational leadership of primary school teachers has 5 elements and 16 indicators, including 1) the vision, 2) the intellectual stimulation 3) creativity, 4) inspirational motivation, 5) flexibility. The results of the study of the existing situation and the desirable situation of creative transformational leadership of primary school teachers showed at practice level every dimension and at overall were high. The study result of how to strengthen creative transformational leadership indicates coaching and mentoring levels were at high. Developed programs to strengthen creative transformational leadership of primary school teachers consisted of 5 modules: 1) the vision which covers three indicators, namely, picture mind, challenge and goal, 2) the intellectual stimulation which covers three indicators, namely, promotion of wisdom use, rationality and the ability to solve problems, 3) creativity which covers four indicators, namely, the initiative idea, the flexibility of thinking, fluency of and the quality of thinking, 4) inspirational motivation which covers three indicators, namely, confidence, concentration in action, hope for success, 5) flexibility of thought which covers three indicators, namely, adaptation according to the situation, adaptation to problem solution and action ability in several dimensions. The second program was guideline-applied coaching and mentoring processes. The results of the study found significant difference between before and after use of the strengthening in that the level after use was higher than before using every module (p-value< 0.05).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».