Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Law is not just an idea; it is a practice.Law helps us find ways of organizing decision making to regulate our actions and resolve our disputes in an authoritative manner.However, what constitutes authority, organization, regulation, and resolution are open questions.The practice of law varies with the context in which decision making is situated.It is coloured by the cultures in which it occurs and is influenced by the beliefs, languages, social structures, political organization, and economic circumstances of the groups within which it takes place.Concepts of time, scale, space, causation, responsibility, opportunity, and success are not the same in all places.The ten articles in this special issue on Indigenous peoples' law, land, and literature examine the impact of these truths.Each author explores how the contours of Indigenous laws can be explored through stories rooted within specific territorial contexts.The following articles reflect on the authors' experiences of working with Indigenous legal traditions through stories.Indigenous legal orders encourage the use of stories to examine regulatory and dispute resolution issues from a grounded perspective.While abstract theories and linear philosophical arguments can be used to discuss Indigenous peoples' law, the articles in this volume reveal another set of intellectual traditions at work.Approximately one year ago, Laverne Jacobs, editor-in-chief of the Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice [WYAJ] asked if I would be willing to act as a guest editor to develop a special issue on Indigenous legal issues.Having served on the WYAJ Advisory Board for some time and having published a couple of articles in the WYAJ during my career, I was very happy to accept the invitation.I immediately identified and invited nine emerging scholars who work at the edge of innovation in their field to write for this volume.They are practitioners and law professors who work with Indigenous peoples' own legal traditions from a community perspective, and, in the process, they are changing how we think about law in Canada.Remarkably, the changes they identify are not always new.The insights they activate are often rooted in centuries-old understandings of Indigenous peoples' relationship with the land.Stories related to Indigenous peoples' land and the laws they implicate are a central theme of this special issue.The lead article in this volume, which is my contribution, describes work occurring in Canadian law schools related to land-based education.Through my experiences on the Cape Croker Indian reserve and my twenty-five-year career as a law professor, the article considers how Indigenous peoples have their own ways of reasoning from the land that generates resources for legal decision makingthrough stories and land-based learning.Along the way, this article describes how law schools are taking students outside the classroom to learn about Indigenous peoples' legal processes and the substantive obligations they generate.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,012 | 0,017 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,031 | 0,016 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».