MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2604111262

Factors Influencing Parental Decision Making for the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine: A Literature Review

2015· review· en· W2604111262 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nemica Thavarajah, Edward A. Chow, José F. Arocha

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational journal of child and adolescent health · 2015
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCervical cancerPap testHPV infectionGenital wartsHuman papillomavirusSex organGynecologyAsymptomaticCervixCervical screeningHPV vaccinesOncologyCancerInternal medicineObstetricsCervical cancer screeningBiology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IntroductionThe human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide, with about 75% of Canadians developing at least one HPV infection in their lifetime (1, 2). A greater risk of exposure are attributed towards individuals who are sexually active at an earlier age, with the highest prevalence of HPV being among people between the ages of 15 and 24 (2, 3).HPV infections are often asymptomatic, but the most obvious symptom is the development of genital warts (2, 4). However, HPV has also been known to be linked to various cancers, accounting for 5.2% of cancers worldwide (4). More specifically, HPV accounts for the cause of almost all cervical cancers, 88% of anal cancers, and 50% of penile cancers (4). HPV has also been known to cause some vaginal cancers, vulvar cancers, and head and neck cancers (2).Pap screening in women are helpful in detecting abnormal cervical cells before said cells become cancerous. The HPV test is another procedure that can help detect infections and precancerous lesions. The HPV test can detect HPV-types that are of high oncogenic risk through detection of the epithelial and cervical cells (5). Although the HPV test is more sensitive than the pap test, the HPV test is currently not standard, routine, or available for men. However, even though the pap test is a standard routine, 15% of Canadian women claim to have never received a pap test and 30% of Canadians have not been screened within the past three years (4).Unfortunately there is currently no cure for HPV; however, the HPV vaccine can help protect again certain types of HPV infections (6). For instance, Gardasil and Cervarix are licensed vaccines that help protect against specific HPV-types. Cervarix protects against types 16 and 18, while Gardasil protects against types 6, 11, 16, and 18 (4). The government of Canada allocated $300 million in 2006 towards the implementation of provincial universal HPV vaccination programs for girls between the ages of nine and 16 (7). The grade eight vaccination program was introduced in Ontario in 2007 which offers an optional HPV vaccine to girls with the consent of their parents. The vaccine (Gardasil) is administered in a three-dose treatment schedule with the first dose being baseline, followed by a second dose two months after baseline, and a third dose six months after baseline (2). Although the public vaccination program has been implemented throughout Canada, the HPV vaccine uptake rate varies across the country from as low as 50% in Alberta, to as high as 86% in Quebec (8).The HPV infection also remains an important issue in men as both men and women can be infected with HPV. Men can transmit HPV to sexual partners; however, there are currently no routine tests to screen men. Furthermore, there is currently no publicly funded HPV vaccination program for boys in Ontario (2). There has been much debate about implementing a publicly funded HPV vaccination program for boys (4).Whether the issue is increasing uptake of the HPV vaccine in boys or girls, the key common underlying factor is the obtainment of parental consent. Considering HPV is an STI, the most effective point of administration of the HPV vaccine is before becoming sexually active. Thus, parents play a critical role in ensuring optimal uptake of the HPV vaccine in children by providing consent (4). However, several studies have shown that there are many factors that influence parental decision making when it comes to providing consent for their children to uptake the HPV vaccine (1,3,6). There are a variety of factors that are often rooted in parental knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes (4). As such, it is important to identify and address these factors to improve vaccination rates across Canada, and worldwide.The primary objective of this study was to explore the literature to determine common factors that influence parental decision making regarding uptake of the HPV vaccine for their sons and daughters. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,031

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0040,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,095
Tête enseignante GPT0,483
Écart entre enseignants0,388 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational journal of child and adolescent health→Même sujetCervical Cancer and HPV Research→Travaux en français237 207→