Modeling and Testing of Shear Connections with Beams under Tension Membrane Loading
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Structural steel framing members subjected to blast loading respond initially in flexure followed by tension membrane as deflection increases. If member connections have been adequately designed and detailed, those members can achieve large deformations and achieve significantly greater load capacity in tension membrane than can be developed in flexure only. The applied load and large deformation of the member produce a tensile axial force that must be resisted by both the member and corresponding connections. With rigid connections, the normal-to-plane deformations cause elongation of the member. Even a small axial elongation along the component axis can produce significant tensile forces. If a portion of the axial deformation could be relieved by incorporating flexibility of the connections, the resulting axial force in the member and the force demand on the connections can be reduced. Moreover, similar concepts used while designing the component are required for the connection design such as: strength, stiffness, ductility, especially if a ductile failure mode in the component is expected. Ample research has been done to study semi-rigid connection behavior during conventional loading. However, there is limited research of connections for members subjected to blast and impact loading. Recently, the University of Alberta has performed research on the behavior of shear connections (SC) of structures subjected to progressive collapse loading. Although this research evaluated response with a lower strain rate effect than typically occurs with blast loading, the connection test data is valuable for model development. Currently, there is no comprehensive blast standard or guideline for design of connections in components subjected to blast load. This paper presents a multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) approach to compute the overall response of a steel member subjected to blast loading, including the component (with large deformation) and connections. Connection models proposed by the University of Alberta are incorporated in the MDOF tool. This MDOF approach can predict a more realistic response of the system subjected to blast loading than provided by typical single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) approaches, which ignore connection flexibility.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle