MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2604336411 · doi:10.1093/pch/18.4.197a

Case 2: A five-year-old boy with fever after travel to South America

2013· article· en· W2604336411 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Johannes, Susan Kuhn, Mireille LeMay, Otto G. Vanderkooi

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueViral Infections and Vectors
Établissements canadiensAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPediatricsMedicineFever of unknown originGeographySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A five-year-old boy presented with daily fevers (39°C to 41°C), leg pain and poor appetite after having returned from Venezuela five days previously. There were no other symptoms, and he was well between the episodes of fever. There was no rural exposure. The child and his parents drank bottled water, but shaved ice was consumed. They were exposed to mosquitos and had contact with sea turtles. They ate many different types of foods, including fresh fruits and vegetables, in a family setting. The mother experienced fever and diarrhea, and the father experienced a mild febrile illness during travel. The child was born in Canada and was previously well. His routine vaccinations were up to date but no pretravel care was provided. Examination revealed fever and mild, right upper quadrant abdominal tenderness. The remainder of the examination was otherwise unremarkable. Enteric fever was suspected and treatment was commenced with intravenous ceftriaxone. Laboratory investigations revealed a slightly low hemoglobin level with normal platelet levels and white blood cell count. His lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein levels, as well as his erythrocyte sedimentation rate, were elevated. Urinalysis, liver enzymes and liver function tests were all normal. Three malaria smears were negative. His serology for acute cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, dengue and parvovirus were negative. Three stool cultures and tests for ova and parasites were negative. A further test yielded the diagnosis. The patient's blood culture was positive for Salmonella poona, which was susceptible to ceftriaxone, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. S poona is a rare serotype causing human disease, and is infrequently associated with enteric fever. There have been previous outbreaks of S poona related to the consumption of cantaloupe, imported from Mexico or Guatemala, in the United States and Canada (1). From the cases reported, up to 33% of cases required hospitalization. The Public Health Agency of Canada reported a S poona outbreak involving 29 cases in 2008, but the source was not determined. There have been reports of S poona infection related to reptile exposure (2). The cases reported involved household pets (iguana, bearded dragon) or a secondary exposure (county fair with iguanas or turtles, patient's father handled reptiles). The clinical presentations included fever, diarrhea (bloody and nonbloody), abdominal pain and malaise. The treatments for S poona infection vary, including requiring no treatment, to requiring hospitalization and intravenous antibiotics. Immunization with the currently available typhoid vaccine is not expected to protect against nontyphoidal Salmonellae, and is only approximately 70% effective against S typhi. Fever in a returning traveller requires careful and timely investigation and management. The present case demonstrates the importance of a thorough travel exposure history. The lack of rural exposure reduced the suspicion for malaria and increased the likelihood of a viral illness or enteric fever. Typical features of enteric fever include fever and constitutional symptoms, such as headache, malaise, anorexia, lethargy, abdominal pain and tenderness. Hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, diarrhea and mental status changes can also occur. Constipation may occur early in the illness. Young children may present with a nonspecific febrile syndrome. Enteric fever is commonly caused by Salmonella typhi or Salmonella paratyphi. Humans are the only host for S typhi. A history of travel to areas where enteric fever is endemic is the principal risk factor. The majority of enteric fever symptoms are extraintestinal, while nonenteric fever Salmonella bacteremias are usually associated with gastroenteritis, the most common manifestation of salmonellosis. The patient was started on ceftriaxone, the standard empirical treatment for enteric fever. He was subsequently stepped down to oral ciprofloxacin, based on the antibiotic sensitivities of his culture isolates, once he was afebrile. Repeat blood culture tests were negative. If the clinical syndrome of enteric fever and other common causes of fever in the traveller are ruled out (malaria, respiratory tract infections, other bacteremias, dengue) it may be appropriate to treat a child empirically despite negative culture test results. The present case is the first report of S poona presenting as enteric fever in a paediatric returning traveller. Fever in the returning traveller requires thorough and timely investigation, with appropriate management initiated while awaiting the results of the investigations. Food and water ‘mistakes' are common, and consumption of enteric pathogens resulting in gastroenteritis or more severe diseases, such as enteric fever, are common presentations in unwell return travellers. Uncommon but important infections to exclude in the differential diagnosis are malaria and dengue.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,002
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetViral Infections and VectorsTravaux en français237 207