Injectivity Behavior of Copolymer and Associative Polymers Decoded Using Extensional Viscosity Characterization: Effect of Hydrophobic Association
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Associative polymer (AP) solutions in general exhibit higher resistance factors and subsequently lower injectivity than hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) because of strong extensional flow characteristic in porous media despite having similar shear viscosity. From a scientific point of view, the challenge is to understand and quantify these properties in terms of the nature of their association in water. The kind of hydrophobic association (intramolecular or intermolecular) that AP exhibit is concentration dependent and will influence not only the shear but also the extensional properties and therefore elongational flow as well in the porous media. Therefore, the role of hydrophobic association on shear and extensional rheology and its effect on the injectivity in porous media requires comparative investigation over its counterpart non-associating HPAM. Unlike shear rheology, measurement of bulk extensional properties for relatively low viscous enhanced oil recovery polymer solutions remains a challenge. In this study, extensional rheology measurements are performed using capillary breakup extensional rheometer (CaBER). The CaBER setup uses a stepstrain to stretch a droplet of liquid placed between the two plates and follows its midplane diameter that declines exponentially in the intermediate time scale where the filament breakup is governed by the balance between driving surface tension and resisting elastic force. The midpoint diameter is fitted with the upper-convected Maxwell model to determine the extensional relaxation time. Extensional viscosity calculated using the axial force balance at the critical Deborah number (Decr) determined using finitely extensible nonlinear elastic model would be indicative of polymer's elasticity along with polymer's relaxation time. These extensional parameters are further used for correlating with resistance factors and injectivity experimental data. Extensional relaxation time of AP and HPAM solutions correspond to 1.2s and 1s at 2000 ppm, whereas at 1000 ppm these values are 0.45s and 0.53s, correspondingly. At Decr, AP demonstrated much higher extensional viscosity (~760 Pa·s) for 2000 ppm solution than HPAM (~470 Pa·s), however, this difference was marginal at 1000 ppm concentration. This indicates intermolecular interaction at higher concentration for AP solution is dominant whereas at lower concentration intramolecular attraction dominates extensional properties. These results are in accordance with porous media observations where AP solution at 2000 ppm showed much higher resistance factors and reduced injectivity when compared with HPAM at low to intermediate rates and similar value of resistance factors and injectivity with HPAM at 1000 ppm throughout all the rates. Further at 2000 ppm, extensional thickening in AP solutions at intermediate rate is followed by strong extensional thinning at high rates. This could be attributed to the transformation of intermolecular attraction to the intramolecular attraction at higher extension rates. AP exhibits comparable injectivity with HPAM in porous media at higher rates due to this transformation. However similar shear behavior shown by these polymers even at 2000 ppm indicates that shear rheology can't predict the intermolecular hydrophobic association of AP in porous media. This is attributed to the lesser inter-chain interactions that occur during shear flow. Characterization method presented here can be used for quantifying the elongation flow in porous media and predicting the injectivity behavior of associative and non-associative HPAM polymers. The method can be used for quick screening of polymers having similar shear rheology.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle