Abstract B25: “TargetDBR”—A DNA repair drug and target discovery collaboration: Exploiting synthetic lethal, high content, and functional cellular reporter assays to accelerate DNA repair targeted drug discovery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Most cancer therapies involve a component of treatment that inflicts DNA damage in tumor cells, such as double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are considered the most serious threat to genomic integrity. Inhibition of DSB repair sensitizes cells to these therapies. Mutations have been reported in nearly every DNA repair pathway and these pathways often exhibit redundancy. Inhibition of functional repair factors can induce synthetic lethality in repair-deficient tumors even in the absence of exogenous DNA damage and whilst sparing healthy tissue. We demonstrate a compound and target discovery platform comprising the integration of isogenic cell line screening, high content repair foci assays and relative DSB repair pathway reporting cells, along with chemical biology and medicinal chemistry. Two diverse drug-like compound library screens have been conducted. Screening for synthetic lethality with deficiency in FANCD2 and BRCA2 led to a hit series broadly active against a range of homologous recombination (HR) repair deficiencies, which is now undergoing medicinal chemistry optimization and target deconvolution studies. Outcome of these initial chemoproteomic target pulldown experiments will be presented. A second cellular screen, (50k compounds) for inhibition of BRCA1 and Rad51 foci formation following radiomimetic drug induced DNA damage, has led to identification of compounds that inhibit damage response after ionizing radiation and selectively inhibit HR repair. Focusing on therapeutic targeting of proliferating tumor cells, our research platform has enabled novel hit compound identification, mechanistic profiling, hit-to-lead optimization chemistry and proof of concept efficacy in in vitro tumor models. Effects on tumor cell clonogenic survival and sensitization towards chemotherapeutics and ionizing radiation will be presented, along with comparisons to known DNA repair inhibitors that demonstrate these compounds' differentiated mechanisms of action. TargetDBR has created a technology platform focused on DNA repair inhibitor discovery and has identified differentiated hits and lead series with potential for development and opportunity to meet the need for new druggable targets in oncology. Citation Format: Jonathan J. Hollick, Laura Abriola, Francoise Bono, Denise Hegan, Pamela Klingbeil, Yanfeng Liu, Ranjini Sundaram, Yulia V. Surovtseva, Mark Whittaker, Ranjit S. Bindra, Peter M. Glazer. “TargetDBR”—A DNA repair drug and target discovery collaboration: Exploiting synthetic lethal, high content, and functional cellular reporter assays to accelerate DNA repair targeted drug discovery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr B25.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».