MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2604472284 · doi:10.1353/scb.2005.0050

Scholia to A Sentimental Journey

2005· review· en· W2604472284 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Gow

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Scriblerian and the Kit-Cats · 2005
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAllusionSwiftConfession (law)Character (mathematics)LaughterMistakeLiteraturePoetryArtnobodyPhilosophyFyodorExistentialismPsychoanalysisArt historyHistoryPsychologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

177 SCHOLIA TO FLORIDA TRISTRAM SHANDY ANNOTATIONS Describing Yorick, the ‘‘lean, sorry, jack-ass of a horse’’he chooses to mount, and his responses to the ‘‘groans of the serious,—and the laughter of the lighthearted ,’’Tristram writes: ‘‘His character was,—he loved a jest in his heart’’ (TS I.10.18–20). Considering Sterne’s apparent fondness for Asses, and his definite affinity with Dean Swift, a note might be useful here pointing to some similar wording in Swift’s ‘‘Beasts’ Confession to the Priest.’’ 19.29–20.1 His character was . . . his heart] A possible allusion to Swift’s‘‘The Beasts’ Confession to the Priest, On Observing how most Men mistake their own Talents’’ (1738). The third stanza begins: ‘‘The ass approaching next, confessed,/ That in his heart he loved a jest:/ A wag he was, he needs must own,/ And could not let a dunce alone:/ Sometimes his friend he would not spare,/ And might perhaps be too severe:/ But yet, the worst thatcould besaid,/Hewasawitbothborn and bred;/ And if it be a sin or shame,/ Nature alone must bear theblame’’(Complete Poems, ed. Pat Rogers [London: Penguin, 1983], 509). In that Swift’s poem is an imaginative version of the traditional satiric apologia, it is a particularly pertinent allusion withintheaccount of Yorick’s lifeand death,yetanotherversion of the same genre. James Gow University of King’s College, Halifax, NS SCHOLIA TO A SENTIMENTAL JOURNEY In an interesting recent discussion of Sterne’s interest in Ephraim Chambers’s Cyclopaedia (Shandean, 13 [2002], 55– 67), Christopher Fanning points to a conflict between the frontispiece, which ‘‘illustrates a conception of knowledge’’and ‘‘the theoretical idealizing diagram offered in the preface.’’ That diagram, with origins in the schematic thinking of Sir Francis Bacon, is a foldout leaf offering a series of divisions by way of an organized , transcendent incorporation of all knowledge, each division subdividing into additional divisions, and the whole visually dominated by brackets representing the unity of each subdivision. Sterne could have seen such diagrams in many works other thanChambers(e.g., in one of his favorite compendiums, Pierre Charron’s Of Wisdom (?1612), pp. 7, 173, 180), but perhaps a work that particularly caught his attention when beginning A Sentimental Journey was An Essay of the Meanes how to make our Trauailes, into forraine Countries, the more profitable and honourable (1606), by Sir Thomas Palmer (1540–1626). The slim volume is divided into two parts, each prefaced by elaborate fold-out leaves diagraming, in mind-numbing detail , the possible reasons for traveling. The possibility that Yorick’s own reasons for traveling, as outlined in his ‘‘Preface in the Desobligeant,’’ may have been influenced by this work (published eleven years before Bishop Hall’s Quo Vadis, which weknowSternereadandborrowed from) should be added to the note to ASJ, 13.1 13.1 PREFACE] (Add atendofpresent note.) Sterne may also have been familiar with—andamusedby—thediscussionof motivations for travel in Sir Thomas Palmer , An Essay of the Meanes how to make our Trauailes, into forraine Countries, the more profitable and honourable (1606). This work has an elaborate set of four fold-out leaves outlining the reasons for travel. Several verbal parallels in Yor- 178 ick’s account may function as a parody of Palmer’s work. E.g., ‘‘This brings me . . . into the efficient as well as the final causes of travelling’’ (13.25–27) is echoed in Palmer’s opening comments about the two motivating causes for travel , ‘‘namely . . . the efficient and finall’’ (2), a phrase repeated again on this page and elsewhere in the work with some regularity . And when Yorick divides his subject on p. 14, and calls particularattention to those who travel because of ‘‘Infirmity of body . . . or Inevitable necessity . . . by land or by water, labouring with pride, curiosity, vanity or spleen, subdivided and combined in infinitum’’ (14.4–9), he was perhaps looking very specifically at Palmer’s diagrams, where one division is between ‘‘Involuntaries’’ and ‘‘Voluntaries ,’’another singles out, ‘‘Decrepite persons , Fooles, Madmen, and Lunatics’’as those ‘‘inhibited’’from travel, and a third diagram tells the traveler particularly to shun ‘‘Ambition, Sensualities, Vaineglory , Couetousnesse, and Vanitie of knowledge.’’Finally,wemaysuggestthat ‘‘peregrine martyrs’’ (14.10...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,958
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,119
Tête enseignante GPT0,323
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Scriblerian and the Kit-CatsMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207