Pathways of Creativity in Contemporary Newfoundland and Labrador ed. by María Jesús Hernáez Lerena
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Pathways of Creativity in Contemporary Newfoundland and Labrador ed. by María Jesús Hernáez Lerena Jonathan Parsons (bio) María Jesús Hernáez Lerena, ed. Pathways of Creativity in Contemporary Newfoundland and Labrador. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2015. Pp. xiii, 341. £52.99. Pathways of Creativity in Contemporary Newfoundland and Labrador is a significant contribution to scholarly criticism on the cultures of Canada’s most easterly province. All of us working in cultural fields connected to Newfoundland and Labrador owe a debt of gratitude to María Jesús Hernáez Lerena, the Spanish academic who compiled and edited twelve essays from eminent local scholars, artists, and commentators. In her introduction, Hernáez Lerena wonders if as an outsider she can “find a safe observing position between, on the one hand, the romantic reverie [of Newfoundland and Labrador] and, on the other, the reluctance to believe in the existence of untroubled idylls” (1). Far from being an obstacle, her outsider perspective brings a refreshing curiosity and newness to the study, compelling the local contributors to reevaluate taken-for-granted assumptions about the cultures of the island and Labrador. The productive tension between “reverie” and “reluctance” that Hernáez Lerena identifies runs through many of the book’s chapters. The collection is remarkable for a number of reasons. First, although the book is weighted toward literary scholarship, it also includes chapters on film, theatre, visual art, and oral storytelling traditions. Such transdisciplinarity in the context of scholarship on Newfoundland and Labrador is innovative and provides a breadth of reference that asks readers to link various creative endeavors. Of special note in this regard are essays by Jamie Skidmore and Noreen Golfman on Newfoundland theatre and film, respectively. Both Skidmore and Golfman offer an overview of creative works in the province and outline some of the central concerns for scholarly criticism. This is the basic pattern of many of the chapters, and so the collection offers a broad view of both the province’s creative cultures and how these cultures are understood by critics. Along with its transdisciplinary perspective, the collection is also unique in the way it prioritizes marginalized voices, including those of Indigenous, women, and Labradorian artists. The inclusion of writers and artists from Labrador is especially important, because in the context of Newfoundland and Labrador political, economic, and cultural discourses, Labrador is all too often an afterthought. Roberta Buchanan’s essay, “The Aboriginal Writes Back,” reverses the colonial gaze by examining autobiographical writing by Abraham Ulrikab, an Inuk, alongside Wayne Johnston’s historical fiction The Navigator of New York. Robin McGrath’s chapter, “The Diarist Tradition [End Page 174] among Labrador Aboriginal People,” is likewise an important contribution in the way it theorizes and interprets writing from Labrador Inuit, Innu, and Métis. Valerie Legge’s entry focuses on writing from women travelers to Newfoundland and Labrador and how such writing shapes discourses about the province. Legge, McGrath, and Buchanan (as well as others) have worked tirelessly to shed light on what I am calling marginalized perspectives from Labradorians, women, and Indigenous peoples. Hernáez Lerena’s inclusion of interviews with creative writers as the closing chapter of the book is something readers are sure to enjoy. The section includes discussions with Michael Crummey, John Steffler, Marjorie Doyle, and Kevin Major, among others, and presents them in a somewhat unconventional way. Instead of offering the interviews in full and as one piece, Hernáez Lerena instead organizes them into thematized sections on creativity, place, identity, and other topics. I found Maura Hanrahan’s remarks to be particularly sharp—her comments on Indigeneity and cultural identity, for example, indicate some of the limitations and pitfalls of creative productions and scholarship from Newfoundland and Labrador. The interviews in the collection push the writers to self-reflexively examine their creative practices and rootedness in the Newfoundland and Labrador cultural milieu. Hernáez Lerena’s outsider perspective once again proves valuable in her approach to and presentation of these interviews since she asks questions and prompts the artists to discuss aspects of Newfoundland and Labrador culture that are interesting and important but may seem self-evident to...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle