MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2604872306

State's Stepping out of the Dominant Values in Women Empowerment Policy: The Experience of Andhra Pradesh, India

2015· article· en· W2604872306 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Satyanarayana Ayinagadda, Lea Caragata

Notice bibliographique

RevueSocial Development Issues · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEarningsWageWelfareEmpowermentPovertySocial securityPublic policyWelfare stateEconomicsSocial policyGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthLabour economicsDemographic economicsDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceLawPoliticsMarket economy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Gender has often been a neglected area in welfare policy, irrespective of the countries' status around the world. As Orloff (1996) observed, little attention is given to how gender relations affect the welfare state. History reveals that welfare provisions in public policy are designed and implemented on the basis of the division of labor in the formal market, considering only male wage earnings and the number of dependents in the family (Perry, 2005). Because male wage earnings are the critical factor in the industrial labor system, men's values are the basis for the design of social security programs (Orloff, 1996). Accordingly, various welfare measures that have been implemented for industrial labor in particular and poverty in general totally neglect women's social reproduction factor, which emphasizes the structures and activities that transmit social inequality. A woman's needs are not a priority for governments because she is considered to be dependent on the male in the family. Needless to say, time and again these welfare provisions are incorporated into public policy, mainly in accordance with the patriarchal core values of the society.Because welfare measures in industrial societies were intended to benefit men and their families, the benefits were less ameliorative to women. Consequently, a disparity between men and women in wages, property rights, health, education, and other areas of women's lives has continued. In response to this inequality, a series of women's movements arose in the beginning of the twentieth century, starting with the temperance movements in the United States, Canada, and the Scandinavian countries. Although these movements were viewed as struggles against women's economic deprivation, their symbolic interaction seems to benefit the overall development of women (Ayinagadda, 1999). Unfortunately, cians and makers were largely untouched by these movements, which they viewed as relating to economics within the family, not to the emancipation of women from all forms of deprivation. Consequently, welfare policies continue to have a dominant value orientation that leaves unaddressed the issues of women. Hence, only recently have governments around the world started to realize the importance of gender analysis and gender relations in their welfare policies.Although this is the situation in most first-world countries, some developing countries in the East, such as India, are leading the implementation of ented public policies. These policies for the welfare and development of women and girls are implemented with the active participation of women. A significant point is that these policies are envisioned and practiced in opposition to the existing ideological values that have dominated the public policy arena in many states for most of the twentieth century. Hence, one might be interested to know why this shift in philosophical and ideological posture is taking place. This article explores why the state of Andhra Pradesh in India is transgressing the dominant values of Indian society to formulate such women-oriented policies.The State's Role in Women Empowerment Policies: A Theoretical PerspectiveGender analysis and gender relations constitute a substantial part of the welfare policy in any democratic welfare state (Ruggie, 1988). However, these topics have not been adequately addressed because of differing ideologies prevailing in certain countries. In this section, a theoretical perspective of the nature and role of various welfare regimes and their impact on gender relations will be discussed.The role of the state is to make appropriate policies and implement them effectively for the welfare of its people. More specifically, Reggie (as cited in Orloff, 1996) conceptualized the role of the state as a commitment to modifying the play of social or market forces in order to achieve greater equality. These forces tend to neglect the poor and the unemployed because they are not self-regulating and are sometimes exploitative. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,044
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,087

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0210,013
Communication savante0,0080,003
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,334
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSocial Development IssuesMême sujetGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsTravaux en français237 207