Case 1: A two-year-old boy with fever and widespread vesicular lesions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A previously healthy two-year-old boy presented to the emergency department at the authors' hospital following a two-day history of fever, oral sores and widespread vesicular lesions with increased irritability, decreased oral intake and persistent fever over the course of the day. His medical history was significant for eczema. Otherwise, he was a healthy child delivered at term after an unremarkable pregnancy. He had no recent travel and no exposure to visitors from foreign countries. Growth parameters and developmental milestones were normal, and his immunizations were up to date. On examination, he appeared mildly distressed, but systemically well. White, well-demarcated lesions were observed on the anterior two-thirds of the lingual and buccal mucosa. Perioral blistering with several monomorphic lesions were noted superior to the vermillion border. Similar vesicles were present bilaterally on the hands, forearms (Figure 1), inguinal regions, distal-medial aspects of the lower limbs and buttocks. Minimal clear-yellow fluid weeped from several lesions and crusting was evident. The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable. Vesicular exanthem in a two-year-old patient distributed along the upper extremity The patient was given a working diagnosis of eczema herpeticum and swabs were sent for bacterial and viral culture, and viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of deroofed lesions. He was admitted to hospital for rehydration and intravenous acyclovir. Swab results were returned on day 2 of admission. Tests for herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 were negative. PCR testing determined the infection to be enterovirus positive. A subpopulation of children with eczema may develop a super-infection with herpes simplex virus, resulting in a vesicular rash referred to as eczema herpeticum. In most cases, eczema herpeticum starts with small, monomorphic, dome-shaped vesicles that may, in severe cases, extend from the face to the entire body (1). Eczema coxsackium was first described in 1968 in a case report by Nahmias et al (2) involving a one-year-old boy with a history of eczema who presented with a generalized, nonpruritic exanthem characterized by vesicular lesions on his trunk, back and extensive involvement on the arms, legs, palms and soles. The vesicles appeared to be superficial and measured 3 mm to 8 mm, with no apparent surrounding inflammatory reaction. There were no pustular lesions noted. Vesicular and ulcerative lesions were observed on the palate and tongue (2). A recent study by Mathes et al (3) investigating atypical presentations of coxsackievirus infections highlighted the eczema herpeticum-like presentation of eczema coxsackium as a variant of hand, foot and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus A6. Mathes et al (3) characterized four presentations describing the severe end of the spectrum of disease associated with this atypical exanthem, distinguishing it from classic hand, foot and mouth disease: An eczema herpeticum-like eruption (eczema coxsackium) Widespread vesiculobulbous and erosive lesions extending beyond the palms and soles An eruption similar to that observed in Gianotti-Crosti syndrome A petechial or purpuric eruption. The present case reflects this variety in presentation; we initially suspected that our patient had a cutaneous herpesvirus infection and treated him accordingly. The PCR result was surprising and prompted us to search the literature for similarly described exanthems. Eczema coxsackium is an uncommon cutaneous manifestation of coxsackievirus infection that can easily be mistaken for eczema herpeticum. While rare, eczema coxsackium and other atypical cutaneous manifestations of coxsackievirus infection should be included in the differential diagnosis for the child with a vesicular rash. Swabs from an unroofed lesion should be sent for viral PCR testing while treatment for suspected herpesvirus infection is initiated pending viral investigations in the hospitalized patient.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».