MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2605371138 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.4.177a

Case 2: A nine-year-old girl with prolonged fever and headache

2014· article· en· W2605371138 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Tahara Bhate, Tobias R. Kollmann, Keyvan Hadad

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematological disorders and diagnostics
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLeukocytosisPhotophobiaHeadachesRashThrombocytosisNauseaVomitingAbdominal painPediatricsPhysical examinationErythrocyte sedimentation rateComplete blood countSurgeryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A previously healthy nine year-old girl presented to the authors' institution (BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia) with a four-week history of fevers, vomiting, headache and abdominal pain. She was first seen in a community hospital following a 24 h history of fever followed by headache, emesis and a generalized erythematous, macular rash. Petechiae were not noted. A diagnosis of viral gastroenteritis was made. The rash subsided quickly but the remainder of her symptoms persisted. Ten days later, she presented again to the same hospital with daily fevers, daily episodes of emesis and debilitating headaches. Her investigations included a normal complete blood cell count, and her urine culture was positive for Escherichia coli. She was discharged on cephalexin for five days; however, her symptoms failed to resolve. She was subsequently referred and admitted to the authors' tertiary care centre. Review of her history revealed daily fevers accompanied by severe nausea and emesis, along with severe headaches without photophobia. There was no history of recent travel or ill contacts. She denied night sweats, neck stiffness or joint pain. Her records indicated a 5 kg weight loss over four weeks. Physical examination revealed a stable patient with normal vital signs. General examination was unremarkable and no neck stiffness or neurological deficit was detected. Laboratory investigations on admission showed leukocytosis (white blood cell count 11.2×109/L) and thrombocytosis (platelet count 423×109/L [normal range 150×109/L to 400×109/L]). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was elevated (76 mm/h). Urine and blood cultures were negative. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a large echogenic right kidney, suggesting possible pyelonephritis. A computed tomography scan of the head and a chest radiograph were normal. A further investigation was performed to reveal the diagnosis. Given the ultrasound results, a provisional diagnosis of partially treated urinary tract infection was made. To complete the diagnostic workup, a lumbar puncture was performed at 12 h of admission and before initiation of antibiotic therapy. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was cloudy, with an opening pressure of 38 cmH2O. Analysis of the CSF revealed a glucose level of <1.1 mmol/L, a protein level of 2.33 mg/L, white blood cell count of 1740×106/L and red blood cell count of 2×106/L. Polymerase chain reaction performed on the CSF was positive for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. The patient was started on intravenous cefotaxime and became afebrile within 12 h of therapy. To facilitate comprehensive evaluation of exposure and possible chemoprophylaxis of close contacts, the case was reported to the BC Centre for Disease Control (Vancouver, British Columbia). All symptoms resolved within 24 h to 48 h. She was discharged after completion of a seven-day course of intravenous cefotaxime. Of note, the patient was subsequently shown to have no complement deficiency, nor was she asplenic. At discharge, she was found to have moderately severe left-sided sensorineural hearing loss; this remained unchanged six weeks later. Infection with Neisseria meningitidis remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Prompt recognition of symptoms and initiation of therapy are essential to prevent possibly serious morbidity and mortality. The infection may be limited to blood or to the meninges, or may involve a combination of both. The most common findings of an acute meningeal infection are neck stiffness, fever and altered mental status. Here, however, we present a case of chronic meningococcal meningitis. Chronic and/or recurrent infections with N meningitidis are exceedingly rare, and are mostly confined to patients with deficiencies of terminal complement components (C5 to C9), C3 or properdin, or with anatomical or functional asplenia. Chronic meningococcemia presents as a triad of spiking fever, vasculitic rash and large-joint arthralgia. The diagnosis is challenging because bacterial cultures are frequently negative, at least in the initial stages of the illness. Meningeal involvement in chronic meningococcemia can occur as a late complication. Our patient was both young and fully immunocompetent, in contrast to reports of this condition in the elderly (1) and in a patient with a complement deficiency (2–5). Additionally, our patient had no clinically detectable neurological findings; this differed from previous case reports (1,2,6) and increased the diagnostic challenge. Our case did, however, resemble other published reports on chronic meningitis due to N meningitidis in that the blood cultures were negative and the response to appropriate antibiotic treatment was rapid. The outcomes of published cases appear to be highly variable, ranging from none to mild gait ataxia or sensorineural hearing loss, as demonstrated in our patient. Chronic meningococcal meningitis can exist in the absence of acute or chronic meningococcemia. Patients with chronic meningococcal meningitis may not always demonstrate classic meningeal signs or neurological deficits. A lumbar puncture is, thus, essential for the diagnosis. Chronic meningococcal meningitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of fever or headache associated with emesis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetHematological disorders and diagnosticsTravaux en français237 207