MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2605696379

Response of wild fish to municipal wastewater treatment plant upgrades

2017· dissertation· en· W2605696379 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keegan A. Hicks

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2017
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueFish Ecology and Management Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWastewaterSewage treatmentFish <Actinopterygii>Environmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringFisheryBiology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Impacts on aquatic biota residing near municipal wastewater treatment plant (MWWTP) outfalls have been documented globally. These impacts may be directly or indirectly associated with elevated contaminants such as nutrients, metals, suspended solids (SS), biochemical oxygen demanding matter (BOD), pharmaceuticals, and personal care products. A variety of effects have been well documented in the Grand River watershed of southern Ontario below the outfalls of the MWWTPs of the cities of Kitchener and Waterloo. Responses in wild fish have been reported at multiple levels of biological organization, ranging from altered gene expression to changes in fish communities, as well as changes in nutrient cycling within the aquatic food web. The most consistently observed effect has been high occurrences and severe cases of intersex (ova-testes) in the male rainbow darter (Etheostoma Caeruleum); this finding represents one of the worst examples of pollution-caused intersex reported anywhere in the world. \nPrimarily in response to the introduction of new effluent quality standards, the Region of Waterloo has invested millions of dollars to upgrade several of its MWWTPs including the facility servicing Kitchener, creating a unique opportunity to conduct a before-and-after study. The main objective of this thesis was to assess if treatment upgrades, which were targeted at conventional contaminants (i.e., ammonia, BOD, SS, and chloride), effectively remediated the responses previously reported in wild fish downstream of the MWWTP. To test this, historical, archived, and new data collections were used to assess changes at multiple levels of biological organization, including changes in nutrient cycling in the aquatic food web, reproductive effects in the male rainbow darter (e.g., intersex), and changes in fish community composition. For comparative purposes, responses in rainbow darter were also examined at numerous reference sites and below the smaller Waterloo MWWTP, which did not undergo any major upgrades during the study period. \nThe treatment upgrades at the Kitchener MWWTP (which included nitrifying activated sludge) improved the overall quality of the effluent; these improvements included reductions in nutrients (total ammonia), pharmaceuticals, and total estrogenicity (E2eq). In contrast, the Waterloo MWWTP had deteriorating effluent quality, with ammonia levels increasing over the course of the study. Changes in effluent quality at both the Kitchener and Waterloo MWWTPs were detected in the downstream aquatic food webs using stable isotope ratios (δ15N and δ13C). Patterns of δ15N in a primary consumer (benthic invertebrate) and a secondary consumer (rainbow darter) reflected the exposure to MWWTP effluents and changes in nutrient cycling in response to the changing effluent quality. A major reduction in intersex in the male rainbow darter below the Kitchener MWWTP outfall was also associated with the improvements in effluent quality. Rates of intersex were reduced by as much as 70% in the first year post-upgrade and dropped to near background levels within three years. Detecting change in fish communities below MWWTP outfalls (including before and after the upgrades) was more challenging. While subtle changes were detected (e.g., increases in pollution-tolerant species below the MWWTP outfalls), these could not be directly associated with MWWTP effluents because they were confounded by a watershed gradient (e.g., stream size). Fish communities were highly variable both spatially and temporally, limiting our ability to associate changes with local environmental conditions (i.e., effects of MWWTP outfalls). \nAlthough rainbow darter has been used as a sentinel species for detecting impacts of MWWTP effluents in many studies, little is known about its movement patterns. Elevated intersex was observed historically at the near-field upstream site of the Kitchener MWWTP outfall, leading to a hypothesis that wastewater-exposed fish may be moving upstream. To inform the interpretation of responses in rainbow darter as a sentinel species, a mark-and-recapture study was conducted at an upstream reference site to better understand their movement. Although the majority of fish (85%) had high site fidelity, a small proportion of fish moved considerable distances (up to 975 m). This study confirmed that there is potential for some fish to move and thereby confound the interpretation of near-field upstream sites that are not physically separated from the sites below the MWWTP outfall. The decline in intersex in rainbow darter after the upgrades at the site immediately upstream of the Kitchener outfall supports the view that at least some of the responses seen at this site were probably associated with fish movements. \n\tOverall, this thesis advances our understanding of the impacts of MWWTP effluents on wild fish and their response to improved effluent quality (i.e., treatment). The relatively simple (conventional) upgrades at the Kitchener MWWTP resulted in improvements in the aquatic receiving environment, indicating that more advanced treatment may not be required to address these effects of concern. However, other impacts may be occurring that were not measured in this study. The results drawn from this thesis may have implications for future wastewater management strategies for other MWWTPs across Canada and around the globe. In addition, these studies may provide insight into key biological endpoints that could be useful for future biomonitoring programs for MWWTP effluents.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,022

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Même sujetFish Ecology and Management Studies→Travaux en français237 207→