Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Music Therapy: An Art Beyond Words (2nd ed.) by Leslie Bunt and Brynjulf Stige. Routledge, 2014. ISBN 978-0-415-45068-3 (hbk); 9780-415-45069 (pbk); 978-1-315-81798-9 (ebk)In Music Therapy: An Art Beyond Words, Leslie Bunt and Brynjulf Stige revisit an earlier edition of a text of the same title (Bunt, 1994). Given the growth and development of the profession in the past 20 years, a revision seems important and warranted. While the authors state that the form of the text is largely unchanged, they imply that there is an added emphasis and reflection cultural and socioecological aspects of music therapy as it is practised in Europe.The text is written for the novice student of music therapy as well as the curious enquirer (p. viii) and thus should be understood as an introductory text. It may be important to note that the most common entry-level degree in music therapy in Europe is the master's degree. The book reads both as a survey text and as a theoretical reader, offering theoretically and in-depth, critical perspectives. Refreshing, contemporary, and more pluralist than essentialist, Music Therapy: An Art Beyond Words integrates a world of voices and perspectives while maintaining a particularly European position.One could be tempted to reduce or diminish this text by referring to it as yet another introduction to the practice and profession of music therapy- albeit a European perspective, which in itself is a refreshing prospect-but that would be a mistake. Within these covers, a high-quality contemporary discourse takes place that will broaden the perspective of the student or novice while simultaneously offering new ideas and potentials for the music therapy educator, whose task it is to bring freshness, potency, and debate to the classroom. Whether this text would be as appealing to everyday practitioners is less clear, although the discourse social justice, community music therapy, and ecological approaches would be useful to music therapists whose embraces these ideologies.Among the many fine points to illumine in this review, the graceful and skillful weaving together of theory and practice stands out. It is always a challenge for those who are in practice to wade through theoretical treatises, yet this text is not at all ponderous. It is accessible to the practitioner, inviting the readerto think about one's through the broader contexts contexts that music therapy theory offers. In a discipline where practice and theory seem at times to be at odds with each other, here the reader has the sense that the authors got on very well, modelling a discourse that connects theory with practice organically.Primarily, this is what I feel this book offers to CJMT readers: many Canadian music therapists (if pressed) describe Canadian context as being grounded in the work and less theoretically oriented than European practice. This text succeeds in discussing theory through the lens of practice rather than as theory alone. Indeed, the pairing of Bunt and Stige reads as a conversation between a respected senior clinician and one of the discipline's most prominent theorists. This collaboration works because each author treats both theory and practice respectfully. Moreover, cultural-environmental theory resonates with Canadian social values-which are admittedly diverse. In this way, the text has much to offer; indeed, it could not be a finer fit for Canadian music therapists had it been written by Canadian authors.After an informative introduction, the book is structured in a logical fashion, beginning with a chapter the growth of the profession.Chapter 2 offers some new perspectives the familiar treatment of the traditional theoretical perspectives that have historically informed practice: medical, behavioural, psychodynamic, humanistic, and transpersonal. The authors then present more contemporary perspectives culture-centered and music-centered foundations for music therapy practice. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,084 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».