Volunteerism, and alignment, are needed for a major paradigm shift in approaches to hypertension control: 2016 World Hypertension League Excellence Award in Hypertension Prevention and Control and the Distinguished Service Award
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
High and increasing blood pressure (BP) over time is a major global concern.1-6 High BP remains the leading risk for death and disability globally, following dietary risks.7 Notably, among the dietary risks, sodium is the leading risk for death and disability and a major causal risk factor for increased BP.7, 8 Much needs to be done. While governmental organizations have a major role, the nongovernmental organizations and especially hypertension and cardiovascular organizations can play very important roles.9-11 Experts in nongovernmental organizations can advocate for needed policy and health system changes as well as working to enhance clinician, patient, and public skills and knowledge about hypertension prevention and control. It is essential to align governmental and nongovernmental organization approaches to optimize prevention and control of hypertension. In September 2016, “HEARTS” was published by the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention to provide guidance in prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases.10 HEARTS outlines a central role for control of hypertension and the various actions that are needed. The World Hypertension League (WHL) has been playing a major nongovernmental role in advocating for a variety of the actions outlined in the HEARTS program.6, 8, 11-24 I feel privileged to have been associated with the WHL as a council member representing Canada on and off since 1999 and more recently on the WHL board as president-elect, president, and past president. I am truly honored to receive the second Distinguished Service Award from the WHL, following Professor Liu Lisheng, who was president of the WHL for 10 years and has been the central figure in hypertension prevention and control in China for over 50 years. The WHL has tremendous potential to reduce the burden of disease associated with increased BP. However, for the WHL to fulfill its potential, hypertension-related organizations and individuals need to provide much greater volunteerism in the WHL and its programs. I have found my personal experiences in the WHL to be rich, filled with constant learning from amazing global experts who share a common passion for improving global health through prevention and control of hypertension. For potential volunteers, I would predict your experiences in the WHL to be similarly fulfilling. The HEARTS program provides a basis for alignment of experts and cardiovascular organizations to advocate for badly needed paradigm shifts in approaches to improve hypertension control.10 It outlines the need to share tasks or to shift the tasks from doctors to either other healthcare providers or appropriately trained nonhealthcare providers. Importantly, optimal management of hypertension and other chronic health risks are beyond the capacity of doctors and, in low-resource settings, would overwhelm all healthcare providers. Even in high-resource settings, lower-cost healthcare providers (eg, nurses, pharmacists, and trained nonhealthcare providers) can provide improved BP control relative to solo physicians perhaps by following more systematic approaches to care.25, 26 Having trained nonhealthcare providers or healthcare professionals other than physicians measure BP is especially important as physicians cause a large alerting reaction in patients, markedly increasing BP.27 It is time all healthcare professionals work together as teams to improve hypertension control in overcoming traditional roles and “turf.” Physicians need to support enhanced clinical roles for other healthcare and nonhealthcare providers. The caveat, of course, is adequate training and support of all staff involved in hypertension management. The HEARTS program advocates use of care algorithms to identify overall cardiovascular risk and guide hypertension management, with registries and performance reporting to facilitate improvement in the quality of hypertension care. To my knowledge, all the clinical trials that examined the effectiveness of antihypertensive drugs used care algorithms in at least one of the intervention arms. These trials also used registries with performance reporting and many also had audits to ensure investigators were adhering to the study algorithm (protocol) and BP reduction goals. In trials, where usual clinical practice has been compared with a standardized algorithm-based care, the algorithm-based care has been superior.28 The Kaiser Permanente Group has implemented a simple hypertension care algorithm with a registry and performance reporting as part of their quality improvement program for hypertension management and has achieved 90% hypertension control.29 I am aware of no clinical trial evidence that shows that hypertension management based on individualized approaches without a registry and performance reporting is effective and yet this is the approach advocated in most hypertension clinical guidelines. It is noteworthy that the traditional recommended individualization of hypertension management is associated with low rates of hypertension control throughout the globe.1 Part of the badly needed paradigm shift in hypertension management is the adaptation of clinical care algorithms to guide clinical hypertension management. Hypertension guidelines, in my opinion, should reflect the need for care algorithms, registries, and performance reporting. A caveat is that hypertension care algorithms require adaptation based on local resources and the availability and affordability of high-quality medication. Hypertension Canada is currently considering how to incorporate hypertension management algorithms with registries and performance reporting and has for several years supported task shifting. I feel proud to also be the third person to receive the Excellence Award in Hypertension Control from the WHL (again following in Professor Liu Lisheng' s steps), recognizing my efforts to enhance hypertension control activities in the WHL and for past leadership in efforts to control hypertension in Canada.30 I encourage others to follow Professor Liu Lisheng's, the other WHL award recipients', and my path of volunteerism in the effort to prevent and control hypertension.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».