MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2607667747

Prohibiting Gray Market Prescription Drugs: The Ethical Dimensions

2017· article· en· W2607667747 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank Cavaliere, Toni P. Mulvaney, Marleen R. Swerdlow, Soumava Bandyopadhyay, Vivek S. Natarajan

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouthern law journal · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiquePharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedical prescriptionGovernment (linguistics)PoliticsChinaPrescription drugGray (unit)Political scienceBusinessLawMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I. INTRODUCTIONThis paper deals with the ethical implications of the gray market for prescription drugs in the United States. It focuses on attempts by people and states to reduce the high cost of domestic prescription drugs by importing or re-importing drugs from countries such as Canada, Mexico, and China, and attempts by the government and drug companies to limit or prohibit such practices.on average, brand-name drug prices are approximately seventy-percent higher in the United States than elsewhere. U.S. consumers would have saved an estimated $59.7 billion during 2004 had they purchased all brandname drugs at Canadian prices. For instance, in Beebe Plains, Vermont, there is a street, 'appropriately named Canusa Avenue,' that runs along the U.S.Canada border. The difference in what residents of opposite sides of the street pay for the same prescription drugs is considerable. Residents of the northern side of the avenue can purchase a ninety-day supply of Lipitor (atorvastatin) for $170, for example, while residents of the southern side of the street must pay $330 to fill the same prescription. 1This situation is complex, emotional, and multi-faceted, and it affects and is effected by numerous parties and principles. it has been in a long period of stasis, where politics trumps law, making this an ideal opportunity to apply the filter of ethical reasoning and analysis. Additionally, it is the kind of visceral real world issue that can be used as an ideal exercise to teach the various types of potential ethical approaches and how they can result in contradictory conclusions.II. The Gray Market DebateGray marketing, also known as parallel importation, occurs when genuine and legitimately manufactured trademarked products intended for a particular country market are diverted to a different country market through unauthorized distribution channels.2 The predominant reason for gray markets to exist is price differentials across international markets.3 Distributors in lower-priced markets often divert products to middlemen in higher-priced markets, who subsequently offer these products to their customers at substantial discounts compared to authorized intermediaries in these markets.4 Gray markets have existed in a number of product markets, including automobiles, textbooks, and The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been active in combatting the re-importation of prescription Recently, the State of Maine has defied the FDA and has been defeated in the trial court over its practice of re-importation of drugs to reduce its health care obligations.5Gray markets employ irregular but not illegal methods . . .: a market that legally circumvents authorized channels of distribution to sell goods at prices lower than those intended by the manufacturer.6 The practice of reimporting to the United States prescription drugs that were manufactured in the United States and then exported for sale in another country is referred to as drug re-importation.7 In 1988, Congress enacted a special restriction on importation of goods returned.8 That restriction prohibits any person other than the original manufacturer to import into the United States a prescription drug that was originally manufactured in the United States and sent abroad.9 Congress specifically found that this restriction was necessary to protect the health and safety of the American public because [l]arge amounts of drugs are being reimported into the United States as American goods returned. These imports are a health and safety risk to American consumers because they may have become sub-potent or adulterated during foreign handling and shipping.10A.The Price ProblemFor people without insurance, prescription drugs often are less expensive outside the U.S. The reason is simple: the U.S. is the only country where there are no price controls over prescription drugs. 11 Americans spend close to $1,000 per person, which is almost forty-percent more than the next highest country's average. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,024
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,129

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0240,026
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,053
Communication savante0,0160,008
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSouthern law journalMême sujetPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyTravaux en français237 207