The Rusty Curtain: Anatoly Chernyaev, Georgi Arbatov, and the Foundations of the Soviet Collapse, 1970-1979
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Douglas Forsyth, Advisor "It seems the Western interpreters of Marxism are right when they say it is an outdated gospel."Such a harsh condemnation of communist ideology might be expected from some persecuted Soviet dissident or perhaps a war-drumming functionary in Washington.However, this quote is from none other than Anatoly Chernyaev, a high-level apparatchik working for the International Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union who found himself disillusioned with the state of Soviet society in the 1970s.In much the same way, Georgi Arbatov, the director of the Soviet Institute for the Study of the USA and Canada, declared that, "one had a particularly sickening feeling inside because of the intolerable propaganda."From these perceptions of the Soviet Union in the 1970s, Chernyaev and Arbatov would rise to become personal foreign policy advisors to Mikhail Gorbachev and active reformers in the 1980s.The current restrictions on research in Russia have turned the personal writings of Chernyaev and Arbatov into resources of nearly exclusive importance on the history of the Soviet Union in the 1970s.Not only were Chernyaev and Arbatov highly placed individuals within the Soviet government, they were remarkably intelligent, creative, and observant men who recorded their thoughts, impressions, and memories of the Soviet Union as it was before the implosion of the communist system.Secondly, Chernyaev and Arbatov recognized how the Soviet Union had gone astray and recorded evidence of its waywardness for posterity.Lastly, Chernyaev and Arbatov's realizations in the 1970s as to the bankruptcy of the entire Soviet apparatus, coupled with their unique positions within that apparatus, specifically v To Mom, my first teacher, and Dad, whose sacrifices made that education possible, and to the "good fight."vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, this is God's thesis, not mine.He wrote it, not me.I was asked to endure many months of uncertainty, anxiety, and arduous work, but in the end, He is the one who brought the project together.There is no way I could have written this thesis alone.Secondly, I want to thank my family for supporting me in my study of History, especially my Mom and Dad who placed great value on my education and made great sacrifices to provide transformative educational instruction for me and my two brothers and sister.So many people have left their mark on this work through their vocation as professional academics.A special thanks to Douglas Forsyth for sticking with me through the dark days of this project and for helping me to see it through to completion.A very warm thank you also to Beth Griech-Polelle for jumping on my thesis committee and helping me to see how my project could come together.Thank you both for trusting me and believing that I was capable of getting the job done.A
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».