Integrated spatiotemporal surveillance system: Data, Analysis and Visualization
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ObjectiveTo build an open source spatiotemporal system that integratesanalysis and visualization for disease surveillanceIntroductionMost surveillance methods in the literature focus on temporalaberration detections with data aggregated to certain geographicalboundaries. SaTScan has been widely used for spatiotemporalaberration detection due to its user friendly software interface.However, the software is limited to spatial scan statistics and suffersfrom location imprecision and heterogeneity of population. RSurveillance has a collection of spatiotemporal methods that focusmore on research instead of surveillanceMethodsBased in Ontario, Canada, we used postal codes for determiningthe location of cases of reportable infectious diseases. The variationin geographic sizes and shapes of the case and census geographiescreated challenges for developing a uniform temporal spatialsurveillance system, including:Linking case and population data due to misclassification errors,Distance based correlations due to irregularly shaped areas(e.g. FSA’s), andVisualization bias due to variation in population density, e.g. largearea with little population.To overcome these challenges, we developed the Ontario HybridInformation Map (OHIM) boundary, which is a combination ofPublic Health Unit boundaries (rural areas), census subdivisions(rural urban mixed) and regular grid cells (urban). The goal is tocapture population details in urban areas without losing informationin rural areas. OHIM has around 4600 geographies with more thanhalf located in urban centers. Population distribution by gender andage group was calculated for each OHIM geography. A lookup filewas also created to link all Ontario postal codes to OHIM geography.To create baselines, historical data for influenza A were used tomodel the seasonality and calculate expected case count for eachOHIM geography for each week. Standardized incident ratios (SIR)were calculated as exploratory statistics, and a spatiotemporal Besag-York-Mollie (BYM) model was used to calculate the probability thatthe risk is higher than a pre-specified threshold. Integrated NestedLaplace Approximation (R-INLA) was used in R to explore differenttypes of spatiotemporal interactions and for fast Bayesian inference.The ability to apply the models was verified by examining previousoutbreaks and seeking the opinion of staff that routinely performsurveillance on influenza.To ensure the visualization integrates with the analysis, R packageShiny was used to build an interactive spatiotemporal visualizationon OHIM boundary utilizing Open Street Map and html5. Theapplication not only allows users to pan and zoom in space and timeto explore the results and locate high risk areas, it also gives users theflexibility to change algorithm parameters for instant feedback. Figure1 demonstrates a zoomed-in OHIM boundary with pointers signalfor “high risk” area at user specified statistics exceeds a threshold(e.g., SIR > 2). Using the algorithms and visualization tools,surveillance experts pick the optimal time and place to be notifiedbased on historical data and therefore the optimal threshold, whichwill be verified by prospectively running the algorithms.ResultsThe OHIM boundaries build the foundation for efficient spatialmodelling and visualization for public health surveillance in Ontario.Together with the integrated modelling and visualization system,staff are able to interactively optimize the aberration thresholds andidentify potential outbreaks in real time. Staff reported preference ofSIR due to its faster computations and easier interpretation.One major challenge was scalability: the ability to handle highresolutions of spatiotemporal data. When the system was applied on4600 polygons by 200 weeks, significant delays were encountered inboth analysis and visualization. Difficulties in computational time,memory requirement and visualization interactivity created delaysand freezing, thereby limited user experience. This problem waspartially addressed by optimizing parameters for fast computationsConclusionsThis work shows the “proof of concept” for an open source,customizable spatiotemporal surveillance system that overcomesexisting data challenges in Ontario. However, more work is requiredto make this fully operational and efficient in production.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».