MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2611706829 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.88.88

Association of BW with Thromboembolic and Bleeding Outcomes in Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016· article· en· W2611706829 sur OpenAlexaff
Kochawan Boonyawat, François Caron, Ang Li, Chatree Chai‐Adisaksopha, Wendy Lim, Iorio Alfonso, Renato D. Lópes, David García, Mark Crowther

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysisInternal medicineRivaroxabanSurgeryWarfarinAtrial fibrillation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and low molecular weight heparin transitioned to warfarin are widely used for stroke prevention in AF (AF) and in acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. Concerns have arisen in DOAC treated patients about the safety and efficacy with extremely high or low body weight due to its fix-dose effect. Whether body weight is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic or bleeding outcomes in anticoagulant treated patients remains unknown. We hypothesized that if the fix dose effect does not hold true, we would observe the higher risk of thromboembolism in high body weight patients and higher risk of bleeding in low body weight patients comparing with non-high or non-low body weight, respectively. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of subgroups of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using DOACs for prevention of stroke in AF and in treatment of acute VTE. We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, PubMED, Clinicaltrial.gov, abstracts and conference proceedings up to February 2016. Two reviewers independently performed screening, assessing eligibility and assessing risk of bias of the included studies. Data on thromboembolic outcome including stroke and systemic embolism and venous thromboembolism and bleeding outcome by subgroups of body weight or body mass index for both the DOACs and comparison arm were abstracted. Relative risk and 95% confidence interval were calculated. The pooled estimate from all studies were performed using Mantel Haenszel random effects model. A total of 9 phase III RCTs were included in the meta-analyses. In patients treated with DOACs and those treated with warfarin, low body weight was associated with increased risk of thromboembolism compared with non-low body weight (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.34-1.85, P <0.0001). The subgroup of AF patients with high body weight had a lower risk of thromboembolism compared with non-high body weight (RR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.28 to 0.67, p =0.002). Bleeding outcomes were comparable for all body weight comparisons.There were no interaction between types of anticoagulant in all body weight comparisons. Low body weight was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic outcomes despite anticoagulation. In contrast, AF patients with high BW had decreased risks. The pooled effect of both the DOAC and the comparison arm were likely attributable to differences in baseline risk of thromboembolism in each body weight category, rather than an effect of the fixed doses of DOAC used in each indication. This study supports the prior observation of an "obesity paradox" and provides supporting evidence of the fixed dose used of DOACs in AF and acute VTE patients. Table 1. Characteristic of included studies Table 1. Characteristic of included studies Table 2. Forest plot of comparison: Low BW vs. Non-low BW, thromboembolic outcomes (-D, DOACs arm, -W, warfarin arm) Table 2. Forest plot of comparison: Low BW vs. Non-low BW, thromboembolic outcomes (-D, DOACs arm, -W, warfarin arm) Table 3. Forest plot of comparison: High BW vs. Non-high BW, thromboembolic outcomes, subgroup analysis based on indication of DOACs ( -D, DOACs arm, -W, warfarin arm) Table 3. Forest plot of comparison: High BW vs. Non-high BW, thromboembolic outcomes, subgroup analysis based on indication of DOACs ( -D, DOACs arm, -W, warfarin arm) Disclosures Lim: Pfizer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Alfonso:Pfizer: Consultancy; NovoNorkdisk: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; University of Perugia: Employment; McMaster University: Employment. Lopes:Bayer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingleheim: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy. Garcia:Pfizer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Crowther:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daichii: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daichii: Honoraria; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics: Honoraria; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Daichii: Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daichii: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Daichii: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AKP America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb - Pfizer alliance: Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AKP America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AKP America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics: Honoraria; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics: Honoraria; Ortho Clinical Diagnostics: Honoraria; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory com

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,019
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: Méta-analyse
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,981
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,100

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0190,053
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0260,038
Bibliométrie0,0070,010
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0030,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
DomaineMéthodes
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→Travaux en français237 207→