MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2612161147 · doi:10.1353/acs.2017.0002

Dorothy Day: Love in Action by Patrick Jordan

2017· article· en· W2612161147 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francis J. Sicius

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Catholic Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligious Tourism and Spaces
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésServantBiographyAction (physics)RealmPersonal lifeInterpretation (philosophy)SociologyPsychoanalysisLawPsychologyPhilosophyHistoryArt historyEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Dorothy Day: Love in Action by Patrick Jordan Francis Sicius Dorothy Day: Love in Action. By Patrick Jordan. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2016. 132pp. $12.95. So many fine writers have documented the life of Dorothy Day in detail, that one might be tempted to ask “why another?” But the significance of (now) “Servant of God” Dorothy Day goes far beyond the objective facts of her life. Many would argue that her most important contributions were spiritual and intellectual and in that realm there are infinite possibilities for interpretation. In his short and very personal biography, Patrick Jordan has given the reader insight into those dimensions of Dorothy Day’s life. This brief work has little room for a detailed story of her life. Rather Jordan focuses on Dorothy’s spiritual and intellectual attributes that most affected him while he worked at the Catholic Worker and served as the editor of the paper for twelve years. And by relying heavily on quotes from Dorothy’s own work he gives the reader the opportunity to hear Dorothy explain in her own voice significant waystations on her spiritual and intellectual journey. Adding to the personal nature of this work, Jordan also makes liberal use of comments by those who knew her well. They provide insightful snippets of Dorothy’s personality at various points in her life, from her years as a young radical writer up to her last days at Maryhouse. From the first pages, the reader has a clear preview of the personal nature of the book. Quoting the engraver Fritz Eichenberg, Jordan describes Dorothy as a person who “had a nose for fragrances, an ear for music—from Brahms to Joan Baez—and an eye for nature” (6). Following this introduction, the very chapter titles (e.g. “Principles and Convergences,” “Catholicity and Lady Poverty,” “Peace and the Primacy of the Spiritual,”) hint at the personal nature of this work. In a chapter entitled “Conversions,” Jordan allows Day to explain that very personal event in her own words. The reader learns that “the odors of the church,” appealed to her “as did the candles and the stained glass.” He reveals that according to Dorothy a principle attraction to the church was that it took into account “body and soul, all the senses. Even ‘telling your beads’ was part of it” (39). Jordan also [End Page 80] lets Dorothy describe in her own words the importance of the retreat in her life. Commenting on the famous 1943 retreats led by the French Canadian Jesuit Father Onesimus Lacouture, Dorothy wrote, “It was about the best education I’ve had in the faith. And it was the teaching I expected when I became a Catholic” (86). Jordan also gives Dorothy’s voice to other major events that affected her life as well her world. Included among others are comments on Peter Maurin, pacifism, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Vietnam War, and the United Farm Workers struggle. Jordan assumes that the reader is already familiar with the particulars of Day’s life. But with Day’s own words and those of people who knew her well, he contributes reflections on some of the most notable details of her remarkable life. While not a comprehensive biography, it is a noteworthy attempt to reveal a portion of the soul and mind of Dorothy as Jordan perceived it. It is a difficult space for a biographer to occupy, but he does it with such sensitivity and clarity that the reader leaves this book with a feeling of knowing Dorothy Day a bit better. Francis Sicius St. Thomas University (Miami, FL) Copyright © 2017 American Catholic Historical Society

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,040
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,133

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,003
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0400,013

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,411
Écart entre enseignants0,362 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican Catholic StudiesMême sujetReligious Tourism and SpacesTravaux en français237 207