MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2613249816

The Relationship between Vocational Self-Concept Crystallization, Ego-Identity Status, and Occupational Indecision, as Mediated by Rational or Experiential Processing/La Relation Entre la Cristallisation Du Concept Professionnelle De Soi, L'état De L'ego-Identité, et L'indécision Professionnelle Par L'entremise Du Traitement Rationnel Ou Expérientiel

2016· article· fr· W2613249816 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeffrey Landine

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2016
Typearticle
Languefr
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyCognitionExperiential learningVocational educationExperiential knowledgeCognitive Information ProcessingSet (abstract data type)Identity (music)Social psychologyInformation processingInformation processing theoryProcess (computing)Applied psychologyCareer developmentCognitive psychologyPedagogyComputer scienceEpistemology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) model of career development (Peterson, Sampson, & Reardon, 1991; Peterson, Sampson, Reardon, & Lenz, 1996) was developed in response to the needs of both counsellors and their clients to understand how individuals process information in conjunction with the task of making occupational decisions. Peterson et al. (1996) proposed that cognitive inputs in the form of self-knowledge and occupational knowledge are processed using a set of generic information-processing skills, and that the stages of processing culminate in the execution or implementation of a plan of action aimed at rectifying the identified problem.The nature of the CIP approach is unique (Zunker, 2002) in that it provides a useful and easy model for how occupational decisions should be made and describes how its components can be applied to career counselling. The CIP model is founded on solid psychological theory supported by a considerable body of research evidence (Jepsen, 2000). Despite the fact that Peterson et al. (1991) developed the theory more than 20 years ago, research evaluation of the model since then has been relatively slow. Additionally, the individual cognitive differences that moderate the decision-making process have not been investigated at any length, as indicated by the bibliography provided on the website dedicated to the theory (Sampson, Peterson, Reardon, & Lenz, 2014).Experienced counsellors will recognize that even when the same information is provided, clients vary greatly in their ability to make an occupational decision. This variability leads to the question: What are the factors that allow some university students to make occupational decisions easily and with confidence, while others flounder and experience significant levels of anxiety as they struggle? The research described here considers how much of the variability in occupational indecision could be attributed to each of vocational self-concept and identity. In addition, it was expected that the crystallization of self-knowledge in the form of vocational self-concepts and a vocational identity and their relationship to occupational indecision would be influenced by the tendency to think rationally or experientially.DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-KNOWLEDGEWhat we believe about ourselves is largely determined by our past experiences and the episodes they have created in memory. Our sense of self or identity is highly dependent on explicit memory for past episodes. This sense of self or understanding of who one is requires access to memories of personally relevant experiences (Klein, 2001). Hart and Fegley (1997) have conceptualized the self as being represented in memory at three different levels. At the highest level, the self-concept is a theory with a set of assumptions about the nature of self in relation to the world. At the next level, the self is made up of many interrelated schemas, and at the most specific level, the self is derived from and represented as specific personal episodes in memory. While all semantic self-knowledge is episodic in origin, over time personal facts from these episodes can be recalled in the absence of memory of the original episode (Haslam, Jetten, Haslam, Pugliese, & Tonks, 2011). The episodes stored in memory contribute to semantic self-knowledge about what we look like, think, feel, want, and do, and to autobiographical knowledge about events in which the individual participated (Haslam et al., 2011; Kihlstrom, Marchese-Foster, & Klein, 1997).Some of the many cognitive tasks that we engage in daily may require contentspecific information from episodic memory alone or from semantic memory alone, and other tasks may require content-specific information from both of these memory systems; self-trait description is one task that requires both (Klein, Cosmides, Tooby, & Chance, 2002). Theories of trait judgement assume that the individual has a database of experiences from which trait judgements can be made. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,319 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapyMême sujetAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyTravaux en français237 207