The impact of auditory feedback on reaching movements with induced paresthesia
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Beyond visual feedback, somatosensory feedback provides information to help determine limb locations and movement accuracy. Previously we found that induced paresthesia removed the predicted movement time (MT) and time to peak velocity (ttPV) differences for reaching movements in vision and no vision conditions. Induced paresthesia also led to early end-position bias, but only when vision of limb was unavailable. The present study investigated if adding auditory feedback for accurate reaching trials improves reaching movements when vision is removed. Fourteen healthy right-handed participants (9 males, M=22.7[SD=2.9] years), performed 400 reaching movements over two days. Four possible targets were paired with four experimental condition combinations: Vision/No Vision; Paresthesia/No Paresthesia. Order of the target locations and visual targets were blocked and counterbalanced. Visual feedback was removed using visual occlusion spectacles (PLATO, Translucent Technologies). Median nerve paresthesia was temporarily induced using a constant current stimulator (DS7AH, Digitimer), and standardized sensory testing confirmed disrupted feedback. Participants were motivated to improve their MTs while maintaining endpoint accuracy with incentives for accurate movements with shorter MTs. Movements were recorded using a 3D motion analysis system at 300Hz (Optotrak-3D Investigator, NDI) and analyzed using a 2 Vision by 2 Paresthesia by 2 Performance (Early trials/Late trials) repeated measures ANOVA. Analyses revealed that participants’ reaction times improved with practice, MTs remained unchanged. A Vision by Early/Late Performance interaction revealed that participants decreased their ttPV only when vision was available (early=192ms; late=179ms). A Paresthesia by Movement Proportion by Performance interaction revealed that with paresthesia trial-trial variability of the limb position increased from early to late performance, however, a difference was no longer present at endpoint. In contrast, limb position variability decreased from early to late performance when paresthesia was not present. The present results support the use of auditory cues to mitigate the detrimental effect of paresthesia on movement accuracy. Acknowledgments: This project was funded by Manitoba Medical Service Foundation, Manitoba Health Research Council and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. We would like to thank Brie Page, Tamires Prado and Aric Bremer for their help with data collection.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle