Notice bibliographique
Résumé
1929, like 1066, 1492, 1865, 1941, 1945, 1969, or 2001, is year more likely than most to mean something to significant number of people. On 24 October, Black Thursday initiated the stock market crash which brought in the Great Depression. Times were prosperous before that day, however, and 1929 was also the year that the Tulsa Zoo opened its first major building, the Bird Hall and Museum. The Tulsa Zoo is one of at least nineteen zoos and aquariums opened in the US in the 1920's (Kisling, 2001). Although the Tulsa Zoological Society was organized in 1927, the animal collection had begun in 1926, when the City authorized the Superintendent of Parks to purchase American Bisons, three elk and several black-tailed deer (Kawata, et al, 1978, 25). Lions would not be received until 1930, and the zoo had no chimp until 1950, no elephant until 1954, no giraffes until 1962, no Polar Bear until 1964, and no rhinos until 1974. However, when the Bird Hall and Museum opened in 1929, it featured birds, more than 200 reptiles, and complete collection ofT ulsa County bird eggs (Kawata, et al, 1978, 5). This building drew some 2,000 visitors each weekend and between 500 and 600 on weekdays. A mounted Whooping Crane was included among 800 preserved North American birds which staff member Eugene Mott, an amateur taxidermist, exhibited at the Zoo, commencingJuly, 1931 (Kawata, et al, 1978, 6, 25). Through the difficult depression years, exhibits ofliving birds kept pace with the stuffed ones. On 1 November, 1930, bid of $1,922 was approved for pheasantry, a large wire structure with 20 runs and native stone shelter in each pen (Kawata, et al, 1978, 6, 25). Two 6-week-old ostrich chicks were part of collection obtained from Fort Worth Zoo in August, 1934 (Kawata, et al, 1978, 26.). In 1937 an exhibit oflocal birds of prey was created to educate the public and combat the prejudice and ignorance ... imbedded in the minds of citizens. Tulsa Zoo played its part in the eventually successful effort to largely end the gratuitous shooting of raptors (Kawata, et al, 1978, 7). Conservation education was taken very seriously by the Zoo's dynamic young Director, Tulsa native Hugh Davis, who served in that office from 1932 to 1966, having joined the staff in 1929. In 1937, the Zoo participated in surveying birds in the cypress swamp in Oklahoma's McCurtain County, in an effort to preserve that endangered habitat. The Zoo was involved in duck-banding program inaugurated in 1939, trapping, banding and releasing more than 10,000 ducks in Mohawk Park in 1940 (Kawata, et al, 1978, 7). It was discovered that ducks flew from Tulsa to virtually every point along the Gulf Coast and into Mexico, to all parts of Canada and to Alaska; most of them, however, were killed in Oklahoma(Kawata, et al, 1978,8). The Zoo sponsored young per- son's field trips and classes in birdhouse building, and loaned mounted specimens to schools .. In 1941, Hugh Davis was elected President of the Tulsa Audubon Society, and with the Daughters of the American Revolution and local garden clubs, campaigned to end the importation of wild bird plumage for millinery purposes (Kawata, et al, 1978,8). Hugh Davis, who was only 22 when he assumed his directorship, was equally devoted to enlarging Tulsa Zoo's bird collection. In the depths of the Depression, the most interesting birds at the Zoo were ones he collected himself. In preparation for collecting expedition of his own, Hugh Davis took part in two expeditions led by celebrities of the time. During almost all of 1933, he was one of the six member Sixth African Expedition of Osa and Martin Johnson. In 1935 he joined Bruce and Sheridan Fahnestock (both younger than himself) in Central America, collecting zoological and anthropological specimens for museums (Kawata, et al, 1978, 26). Although details are not now clear, it appears he was able to collect 25 parrots from Guatemala for the zoo (Kawata, et al, 1978, 26). Finally, in June, 1936, Hugh Davis directed seven member expedition to the Caribbean, on the Eden, 62-foot, 22-foot beam, 4Yi-foot draft boat with 12-cylinder motor (Davis, 1936a). The crew of seven included his wife, Melba, and two Tulsa school teachers. Along with living animals and plants for Tulsa Zoo, preserved marine life was collected for the zoo's education programs and Eastern Museums (Davis, 1936c). Davis was also expected to collect animals for Eastern Zoos (Davis, 1936c), and did send 30 Plumed Baslilisks (Baslilscus Plumifrons) and series oflarge Meso-American Sliders (Trachemys Venusta) to San Diego Zoo, coinciding with the opening of Reptile Mesa there (Davis, 1936d). These activities were documented as movies by Davis himself (Davis, 1936d). Substantial financial support came from the Tulsa Junior Zoological Society (Martin, 1936c). The Eden departed from Florida to the Bahamas, where four species of cactus were collected (Davis, 1936b). After brief stop in Jamaica (Davis 1936c), the expedition arrived at the Roatan Islands off the coast of Honduras, then established base camp at Brewer's Lagoon (present day Brus Laguna) on Honduras' Miskito Coast where the living animal collection was assembled (Davis, 1936d).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,055 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».