MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2614066827

Therapeutic Songwriting: Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice

2016· article· en· W2614066827 sur OpenAlex
Jeffrey Hatcher

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMusic Therapy and Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInternshipPracticumMusic therapyMedical educationPsychologyMedicinePsychotherapist
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Therapeutic Songwriting: Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice by Felicity A. Baker. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. ISBN: 978-1-137-49921-9 (hbk), 978-1-137-49922-6 (pbk), available in Kindle version.With Therapeutic Songwriting: Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice, Felicity Baker offers the music therapy profession a landmark work on the topic of songwriting as used as a therapeutic intervention. This book is the result of several years of research Baker conducted with therapists in 11 countries, which included Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Qatar, Korea, Iceland, Finland, and Denmark. This foundational research involved three separate studies: indepth personal and social media interviews; interviews and songwriting exercises with groups of university students and retired citizens; and an extensive series of songwriting sessions with clients living with neurological injuries.My own experiences with the therapeutic use of songwriting began with my final music therapy practicum in 1999, a time when there was much less awareness of the potential extent of the clinical application of songwriting than there is now. Songwriting as a clinical tool was touched upon briefly during training at that time, usually offered cursorily as something of an engagement tool, particularly when working with very young children. Without use of a formal guide I began to use therapeutic songwriting during student practicum placements, and I continued to use songwriting into my internship and then in my professional clinical life. A few years into my practice, during the writing of my thesis (Hatcher, 2004), I discovered a growing number of studies about therapeutic songwriting published 1990 onward (e.g., Cordobes, 1997; Edgarton, 1990). Prior to that, Ficken (1976) and Freed (1987) had been the only authors to address this topic.In Therapeutic Songwriting, Baker remarks on this rise in the number of published papers on the use of therapeutic songwriting, noting the publication of more than 50 papers or chapters between 2010 and 2014. She also observes that the literature is maturing, having shifted gradually in approach over two decades case studies to descriptions of methods to understanding songwriting's role-a trajectory from observation . . . to exploratory . . . to explanatory (p. 15), suggesting that the clinical use of this technique is coming into its own. This, Baker's own addition to the literature, is a remarkably comprehensive work. She outlines the elements surrounding songwriting when used therapeutically: the multitude of influences such as environmental, individual, and sociocultural; the various methods of therapeutic song construction; and the models of therapeutic songwriting. She also provides an extensive reference list.In the final section of the book, Baker divides the models of therapeutic songwriting into outcome-oriented, experience-oriented, and context-oriented classifications, providing a thorough list with a wealth of variations and extrapolations. Music therapists could, as a result, form a new relationship between themselves and their use of the song generation process in clinical settings. In my own early uses of therapeutic songwriting, I would have welcomed a discussion of the differences in the models, as Baker provides here. I see now that I, as undoubtedly has been the case with many other therapists, was often moving back and forth between interventions that were oriented to outcome, experience, and context, not always aware of the shift in orientation as I proceeded. Lastly, I note that within this segment of the book Baker makes an especially valuable contribution to the literature in her exploration of feminist music therapy, in which she brings readers up to date on current interpretations of feminism, and which is timely and welcome. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,935
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,107
Tête enseignante GPT0,428
Écart entre enseignants0,321 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle