MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2614066827

Therapeutic Songwriting: Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice

2016· article· en· W2614066827 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffrey Hatcher

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMusic Therapy and Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInternshipPracticumMusic therapyMedical educationPsychologyMedicinePsychotherapist
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Therapeutic Songwriting: Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice by Felicity A. Baker. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. ISBN: 978-1-137-49921-9 (hbk), 978-1-137-49922-6 (pbk), available in Kindle version.With Therapeutic Songwriting: Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice, Felicity Baker offers the music therapy profession a landmark work on the topic of songwriting as used as a therapeutic intervention. This book is the result of several years of research Baker conducted with therapists in 11 countries, which included Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Qatar, Korea, Iceland, Finland, and Denmark. This foundational research involved three separate studies: indepth personal and social media interviews; interviews and songwriting exercises with groups of university students and retired citizens; and an extensive series of songwriting sessions with clients living with neurological injuries.My own experiences with the therapeutic use of songwriting began with my final music therapy practicum in 1999, a time when there was much less awareness of the potential extent of the clinical application of songwriting than there is now. Songwriting as a clinical tool was touched upon briefly during training at that time, usually offered cursorily as something of an engagement tool, particularly when working with very young children. Without use of a formal guide I began to use therapeutic songwriting during student practicum placements, and I continued to use songwriting into my internship and then in my professional clinical life. A few years into my practice, during the writing of my thesis (Hatcher, 2004), I discovered a growing number of studies about therapeutic songwriting published 1990 onward (e.g., Cordobes, 1997; Edgarton, 1990). Prior to that, Ficken (1976) and Freed (1987) had been the only authors to address this topic.In Therapeutic Songwriting, Baker remarks on this rise in the number of published papers on the use of therapeutic songwriting, noting the publication of more than 50 papers or chapters between 2010 and 2014. She also observes that the literature is maturing, having shifted gradually in approach over two decades case studies to descriptions of methods to understanding songwriting's role-a trajectory from observation . . . to exploratory . . . to explanatory (p. 15), suggesting that the clinical use of this technique is coming into its own. This, Baker's own addition to the literature, is a remarkably comprehensive work. She outlines the elements surrounding songwriting when used therapeutically: the multitude of influences such as environmental, individual, and sociocultural; the various methods of therapeutic song construction; and the models of therapeutic songwriting. She also provides an extensive reference list.In the final section of the book, Baker divides the models of therapeutic songwriting into outcome-oriented, experience-oriented, and context-oriented classifications, providing a thorough list with a wealth of variations and extrapolations. Music therapists could, as a result, form a new relationship between themselves and their use of the song generation process in clinical settings. In my own early uses of therapeutic songwriting, I would have welcomed a discussion of the differences in the models, as Baker provides here. I see now that I, as undoubtedly has been the case with many other therapists, was often moving back and forth between interventions that were oriented to outcome, experience, and context, not always aware of the shift in orientation as I proceeded. Lastly, I note that within this segment of the book Baker makes an especially valuable contribution to the literature in her exploration of feminist music therapy, in which she brings readers up to date on current interpretations of feminism, and which is timely and welcome. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,048
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,048
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,254

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0480,035
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0060,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,032
Communication savante0,0170,017
Science ouverte0,0040,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,107
Tête enseignante GPT0,428
Écart entre enseignants0,321 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations70
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian journal of music therapyMême sujetMusic Therapy and HealthTravaux en français237 207